this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
349 points (90.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21194 readers
1847 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] [email protected] 112 points 1 month ago (22 children)

    I think most snap haters mostly hate, that Canonical forces snap upon them, an wouldn't hate so much about it if they had the choice.

    [–] [email protected] 81 points 1 month ago

    Yeah, who'd hate using a package manager that increasingly slows down your boot time with every package installed, or that uses a closed source store to provide you FOSS

    Maybe there's a reason canonical has to force it on their users

    [–] [email protected] 72 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    I also hate that it creates a loopback device for every installed snap

    [–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago

    There's a lot I dislike about snap. This is the thing I hate.

    [–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

    Yeah typing "apt install firefox" and getting the Snap version does loudly and obnoxiously disqualify Ubuntu from any devices owned by me or my family.

    [–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

    Thanks to snap I switched to arch. It gave a linux beginner so much drive to learn the terminal and install a harder os lol. The firefox snap was the worst shit.

    load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    I never used snap, always use official repo > multilib > extra > chaotic aur > aur > flatpak > FUCK IT, I BUILD FROM SOURCE CODE FROM SHADY GITHUB REPO

    [–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago

    FUCK IT, I BUILD FROM SOURCE CODE FROM SHADY GITHUB REPO_*

    I feel seen.

    [–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    curl shit | sudo bash is just so convenient.

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I hope you mean https://shit.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    http://mysite.net | sudo bash

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

    The safest install method \s

    [–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Thread made by canonical employee

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Now also throw GNU Guix, Homebrew and some AppImages in there

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    People using Linux should take their heads out of their asses sometimes and just let people enjoy things they way they prefer.

    [–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Fuckin preach it friend!

    That's the joy of Linux, the "have it your way" approach to an OS

    [–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (25 children)

    yeah well, you can't have it your way on Ubuntu when Canonical FORCES you to use snaps (heck they even hacked apt to prefer snaps instead of debs)

    load more comments (25 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    It's a shame that snaps are forced to use Canonicals closed source backend because they are really good, and a fully snap system is a very compelling idea for immutable systems

    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Snap is bad. I only say this as someone who did a lot of OS security work for Linux and Unix, so take that with a grain of salt.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

    Would you mind explaining why? I'm genuinely curious

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

    snap bad indeed

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    I have NODE installed using snap lmao. Why? Installing it the normal way just gives me tons of errors that I'm too bored to deal with. I'm sure there's a fix, but I'm too lazy to debug all that. Of course, I don't use snap node for hosting servers and stuff. I just use it for react native. Regardless, it works n I'm happy lol

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Yeah. I don't mind snap at all for cases where a better package doesn't exist.

    What made me give up Ubuntu was how it railroaded me into snap versions of packages that work better, for me, as native .deb installs.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Oh definitely. Canonical forcing us to use snap Firefox was very shitty. I mean I still use Ubuntu because I'm lazy, but I did change the snap Firefox thing to the apt libraries or whatever.

    I really don't understand why they don't just adopt flatpak.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

    I use nix like the AUR for debian.

    load more comments
    view more: next ›