Wasted my time watching this. 23 minute video that repeats itself so often there's only ~30 seconds of information. It feels very AI-generated. And it is not possible to "visualize 4D", the video does not prove otherwise.
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
-65 points (9.9% liked)
Technology
59111 readers
3721 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It's possible to "visualize" 4d with projections to lower dimensions. This video is just bad at explaining.
And it is not possible to "visualize 4D"
Sure it is.
- 3 spatial dimensions + time
- 3 spatial dimensions + 1 color dimension (grayscale)
- 2 spatial dimensions + 2 color dimensions
- etc
And that's not even counting projection. All the time we interact with 3D data that's projected to 2D (almost every photo you've ever looked at). There are similar ways to project 4D to 2D.
(Not defending the video or anything, just pointing out that visualizing higher dimensions is something we know about for ages.)
I took a shortcut when typing that, quoting the OP instead of further explaining. It is definitely possible to visualize 4 datapoints, but not 4 spatial dimensions. The only way to do so is to project to lower dimensions or take a lower dimension slice and display that. That works for 2D slices/projections of 3D objects because we already have a full understanding of 3D. It does not work for 2D projections of 4D objects, similar to how "flatlanders" couldn't make sense of a 2D or 1D projection of a 3D object.
I see. Yeah, obviously the world only has 3 spatial dimensions, so you can't represent 4D data spatially.
My general point is that we have additional senses that we can use to represent additional dimensions. And that totally counts as "visualization".
Who is trying to fool people? It's well known that 4D can be visualized with 3d projections, fibrations, etc. It's a topic in Flatland (1, 2). Ancient news.
With this mindset, if we encounter something novel that doesnt exist or isn't possible in 3d, instead of fighting with our brains we can simply say that a 4d universe allows such a possibility and in order to gain a 4d understanding which we have chosen to undertake we have to accept it.
wow so if I just say "it must be in 4d then" everytime i see something impossible in 3d I will slowly start thinking in 4d. thats amazing. /s