this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
201 points (99.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54443 readers
466 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

According to an official statement on Ryujinx's Discord server, developer gdkchan was contacted by Nintendo and they were offered an agreement to stop working on the emulator project, and while the agreement wasn't confirmed yet, the organization has been entirely removed.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Someday we’ll learn that GitHub just isn’t the place for this kind of stuff…

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What is the alternative?

Closed source "I swear this executable that will let you play all the games you want is legit" hosted on sourceforge or random websites that get hugged to death every day that ends in a y?

Also: it isn't like that would stop this kind of legal action. MS/Github are barely a factor. It is the devs themselves getting the "hey, stop it or we'll turn you into indentured servants" letters.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There is a p2p one called https://radicle.xyz/

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I agree with your second paragraph, but you do know there are plenty of good alternatives to Github right?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

GitHub has nothing to do with this. All the information we have is that the dev himself took everything down after an agreement with Nintendo.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

In the meantime, anyone got a backup of the sourcecode & the binaries for win/linux?

When it was clear Yuzu was on its way out, I took out a backup and saved it in my personal server to share around with friends who asked, but Ryujinx disappeared without an announcement, so I didn't get a chance to do that.

EDIT: Managed to find a backup of the source from just a few hours ago and save it to my own server. Guess I'll have to compile it on my own if I want to share binaries with people who ask :P

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What was the final build? I have 1.1.1402 on my PC.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think you might have the latest. The flatpak version that is currently on my machine is 1.1.1397 -- But the source I just grabbed and didn't build is more recent.

EDIT: The flathub build is still up -- For now. I pulled the latest update from there. It was 1.1.1403

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Thanks, i git cloned from here as a backup.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago

For anyone looking, someone Archive.org'd the final Win x64 compiled version:

https://archive.org/download/ryujinx-1.1.1403-win_x64

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The agreement: You agree to take it down and we agree not to take your house and 30% of your salary until you die.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm not so sure. It's possible Nintendo opted for a carrot rather than a stick in this case.

This doesn't seem to have been started with a public C&D letter like usual. Yuzu (the previous Switch emulator that was taken down) incorporated some proprietary Nintendo information, which is why Nintendo had a legal lever against them. They don't have one in this case, yet it still came down. Plus, everything seems to be have been going on very quiet behind the scenes.

If you were an emulator writer and Nintendo came and offered you life changing money in exchange for ending the project, would you take it? I would have a very hard time turning that down. Nintendo also doesn't want a flood of yokels trying to start the project up again hoping to receive the same offer; most would fail, but one or two might take off. Better to let the threat be implied.

This is just speculation, of course, but something about the way this has unfolded feels a little different.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

"Agreement" is quite a fucking twist on "threat."

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So an alternative will pop up right? At this point pirating nintendo games is a moral obligation

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

There are only so many programmers who are good enough to create an emulator, and a lot of them are already doing other projects. The Switch is also a very complicated system, and it needs a small team to pull it off.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Goddammit!

 

Why won't Nintendo just FUCK. OFF. with this crusade of theirs??!!

 

 

 

 

^(And^ ^before^ ^anyone^ ^mentions^ ^it,^ ^yes,^ ^I'm^ ^aware^ ^as^ ^to^ ^why^ ^they^ ^don't.^ ^The^ ^question^ ^was^ ^rhetorical.)^

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A federated github might solve this right?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nope.

C&Ds and legal threats still go to a person who isn't going to go to jail or have their wages garnished by Mario until the end of their days.

At best you have a single gitlab instance running in a country that is known to not cooperate with those kinds of demands. But... just ask the various torrent sites how well that works after actively pissing off an army of lawyers who don't mind slipping a hosting company a couple hundred bucks to get the identity and address of the person paying for that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hosting a git instance with Njala?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

C&Ds and legal threats still go to a person who isn’t going to go to jail or have their wages garnished by Mario until the end of their days.

At best you have a single gitlab instance running in a country that is known to not cooperate with those kinds of demands. But… just ask the various torrent sites how well that works after actively pissing off an army of lawyers who don’t mind slipping a hosting company a couple hundred bucks to get the identity and address of the person paying for that.

Plenty of hosts and providers over the years have claimed to be super privacy oriented and blah blah blah. Once they get a legal request, they roll over. Because they aren't going to prison for the customer anymore than they are going to prison for you.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, but a gitea/forgejo instance as a hidden service might.

One of yuzu's forks went that path: http://vub63vv26q6v27xzv2dtcd25xumubshogm67yrpaz2rculqxs7jlfqad.onion/torzu-emu/torzu

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

NOT publish releases

Well there goes that one for most people

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If we keep using the current version and it never gets any updates, will it keep running the whole Switch game library.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Mostly, probably.

I would expect the legal teams to slow down once the switch becomes obsolete. (Like the SNES, GCN, etc.) At that point some other group will take up the mantle and patch whatever is broken.

... That's my guess.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People please try using https://radicle.xyz/ for hosting source code. I haven't used it but the idea of it sounds pretty cool

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The dev got bribed (or threatened) by Nintendo to manually delete the repo. GitHub this time didn't do anything

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Lol, why do you think payment is the more likely of the two options?

Why the hell would Nintendo pay them anything when a C&D is cheaper and just as effective.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

As I understand it, cause of the country the creator is from, a C&D was unlikely to be enforceable. Money, on the other hand, is a universal language.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

C&D in Brazil stands for Comedy & Despair, where you're the one laughing at the company desperate to get you to do what they want without having any actual legal leverage

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

C&Ds are generally just threats to take someone to court. They aren't themselves enforceable.

Even I can send C&Ds if I want but I don't have anything to back them up with. Nintendo on the other hand absolutely does.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

By "enforceable," I meant, "the reasonable legal means to follow up".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think this is the more probable version of events.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Until now the stance was "rofl in Brazil C&Ds are a waste of money", so the bribe option makes sense.

Suppose that they calculate $1 million in legal costs in order to take the case to a court, then offering something like $200k to delete the repo is a big saving.

The dev of simple mobile apps sold millions of users to an ad company for just $30k which was almost pennies if we think how popular those apps were in the Foss community

Now, backups of the code are widely available, will the development continue without the main dev? Suyu (fork of yuzu) made almost no progress since the fork

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Money Talks, Bullshit Walks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

At least with radicle all the forks will still exist even if the authoritative copy is taken down. And even then I think because radicle is like BitTorrent, anybody who pinned the main repo would still be seeding it so it would be very hard to scrub it completely. The main challenge in using radicle is getting an active contributor with some reputation to maintain their copy on there. Otherwise there's no momentum and nobody will pin the countless mirrors published by randos.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nintendo's real intent is doubtless to try and ensure that nobody ever makes a functional emulator for the upcoming Switch 2.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Good fucking luck, the hardware will likely be a 2022 tablet if the switch is anything to go off of. Considering as well the console will likely have similar architecture, and switch emulators already exist, I'd give it about 3 months.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Damn, I just got a mac and it has replaced my switch thanks to this brilliant software

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they probably would have been fine if they weren't shown as being used to play the leaked echos of wisdom....

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Don't think so, one day it would be shutdowned by Nintendo

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Sigh...

Just had to find about it here https://youtu.be/XrRlL7_coh0

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

seems like there have been multiple contributors. so many clones of the repo....

load more comments
view more: next ›