this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
116 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7499 readers
74 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When I first joined this community I saw it as a respite from reddit where I was free to chill with people without being constantly expected to debate or defend arguments or anything. Just a forum where people are nice.

Lately though it seems every active comment section is filled to the brim with, to be frank, obnoxious people who want nothing more than to fight with you about everything you say. I think they're known as "debate bros."

I'm not saying debate shouldn't be happening but to be honest it's disappointing seeing it be the only thing occurring. I've tried contributing in other fashions but have been met multiple times with people trying to start arguments with me about things or get me to defend "points" that I didn't make. This in particular has been very annoying. I've reported every instance of this due to it not contributing but I feel as if that's not helping.

I like talking to people I disagree with. I like conversing with differing opinions. But I feel alone in that this isn't the only thing I want to do on a forum.

Again, I'm not trying to definitively say we shouldn't debate at all, but just pointing out how prevalent it seems to be. Id like to just converse with people without being expected to make and defend points. I feel like that's a major thing we should've left on Reddit.

If people want to debate then they can do that. I just dislike that it appears to become the base-level expectation for the instance.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've been on the internet long enough to know that any argument that goes on for long enough is going to get uncivil. You're also very unlikely to convince someone who feel threatened by your point.

So I've got a soft 'respond once' policy. if someone replies to one of my comments, I respond once to clarify my position and address anything important. If I have failed to make my point by then, then my writing ability will continue to be insufficient in n > 2 comments, and I am adult enough to let them have the last word.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Yeah this how I operate now. It's not worth my time to argue with people. I don't even post a second response a lot of the time, especially when the interjection is obnoxious.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Ohhh, this is a good policy. I'm taking this!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Great policy, thanks for sharing!

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've noticed this everywhere on Lemmy - I don't think this is a Beehaw exclusive. My guess is that as Lemmy grows, more and more people are lurking and reading every post/comment you make. Most people will pass by without a debate, but if 1000 people read your post all it takes is one person to decide they want to start an argument.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absence of disable inbox setting for comments or threads like on Reddit is also a contributor I think, since if you are the type to have to defend your comment then it leads to a back and forth that can go longer than on reddit since you will be made aware of the reply with no ability to turn it off for either party.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

I’ve noticed this everywhere on Lemmy

Same here. And it's been wave after wave of negativity of outside events flocking people. June Reddit API change, then Zuck @ Threads hate, Twitter to X shockwaves, and now Trump back on Twitter. It hasn't been people seeking out positive as much as it's been world wide web of anger.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. Lemmy/kbin/etc as well. I was just thinking to myself idk why I’m even on here. It feels like every comment I make, I end up having to defend myself, no matter how innocuous the comment.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I said it would be funny if the next elder scrolls games smashed expectations and was good, in an ironic kind of funny. I mentioned baldurs gate 3 due to it being also incredibly well received and was immediately met with a person who wanted to argue that the two games aren't comparable.

I agree with them but I wasn't even trying to make that argument in the first place. Just mentioned BG3 because it released like two weeks ago. Was very disappointing to see such a misrepresentation of what I said.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I saw that comment and literally thought to myself "Wow they are getting the same nerd hate that I keep getting. Is this everywhere?!"

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that might have been a thread I called someone out for being unkind. They jumped to ad hominem in response to a really innocuous comment

Someone I called out recently for being unkind replied essentially saying that all of Beehaw are snowflakes for wanting to eliminate vitriol. That comment was deleted, I assume by a mod/admin, very quickly, so kudos to whoever was watching that thread/report!

I am very thankful to the volunteers trying to keep Beehaw true to its mandate. Hence why I'm trying to do my part by calling people out when they break the only rule here.

TL;DR:
Maybe that's what will move the needle? If we, as non-mods, normalize calling out unkind behaviour then it derails the "performance snark" and ruins the "fun" of trolling.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, I think some of it is Beehaw-specific because everyone flocked to Beehaw with the idea of building a better community and being better then slowly reverted back to their Reddit-arguing selves.

Lemmy/kbin/Fediverse was also very bubbled to Linux and privacy-focused people, now it's grown and keeps growing and that original bubble is very closed-minded. I've found a few times where I've mentioned some generally obvious things like "deleting Facebook means that a lot of people can't talk to the elder folk in their family." a common thought that is generally agreed upon but yet I got a bunch of people saying that was bullshit. A phrase I've started to like is "terminally online" which Lemmy seemed to be filled with. People who refuse to see there is another opinion out there and that even their opinion isn't common. Even when their opinion is refuted by statistics. They seem to just press on.

So I see more arguing on two levels. 1) Beehaws NRE has worn off. 2) Fediverse got an influx of more people bringing in a more common mindset that the old Fediverse crowd was generally against because they lived in a bubble. (which I know I'll get a lot of hate and arguments of "no, we didn't", "Linux is clearly the best OS", "Microsoft is literally Nazis!", "Privacy isn't dead yet!"

Just in my experience a lot of people on the Fediverse seem to have the attitude of "my opinion is the facts" or "the one thing I read on the corner of the internet with no cites is the definitive fact!". They are more closed off than Redditors. It's been surprising how many posts I see saying "We don't need to be like Reddit!" To then discover they aren't like Reddit, they are far worse.

Frankly, this whole thing has made me second-guess trying to leave Reddit behind. The only thing stopping me is a decent phone app to it. I could see myself somehow trying to set up a PWA with RES built into it if that's even possible. I see far more decent conversations (and open-minded people) on Reddit than here at this point and it's a huge shame.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

A lot of it is very black and white thinking/refusal to see nuance...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Absolutely agree! There is no wiggle room. These arguments are usually someone saying something definitive and someone else saying "No, it's directly this way and always this way. There are no alternatives!" or "The alternatives are unethical, and if you use them your entire existence is unethical!" or worse "I am superior to you if you use these unethical alternatives because I can get by without them!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you're both wrong.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I am always right!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

I've done a lot of reading since I joined here, and not much replying or posting. What I have noticed is that there does seem to be a certain number of people replying in different threads with similar arguments which end up getting people riled up. I am starting to recognize some of the user names, and I confess that when I see one now I tend to just drop the thread and stop reading.

I am not suggesting that what you are noticing in only due to that, since obviously there are a ton of people coming and going, but there are definitely "regular players" who seem to not know how to engage in a positive way - no matter what the topic. In some ways, I also think it's likely to always be an inevitable issue here specifically since Beehaw has made its goals as a site quite clear. I think it just urks some people coming here that this site strives to be a positive, welcoming space and so the idea of compromising that is likely part of the appeal for the behaviour.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the honey moon period is over for all instances and communities when people were motivated to comment with the goal of trying to encourage user growth by being nicer than they usually are.

Now that people are settling in they are more comfortable using the fediverse like they've done on social media. Which does change the type of posts and comments that now come out.

So arguments are expected for even trivial topics like games. It's good or bad thing depending on the viewpoint, but was expected outcome since motivations for posting was much different in the earlier days.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think that it wasn't a honey moon period, but more so people are getting settled in and attempting to bring in toxicity because some people just crave toxicity for no logical reason..

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While I'm not a psychologist, I read far too much crap online, so take this as a layman's view.

There's been a lot of research around the dopamine feedback loop around social media, as well as the fact that arguing and "winning" is a major dopamine hit, so I wouldn't be the least bit shocked that a lot of the more toxic people are literally addicted to the dopamine that social networks give you that they're arguing and posting for no other reason than their next hit.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Oh no, they quite literally are. You pretty much nailed the root of it, and also brought up a good point as to why for profit social media tends to become so harmful. Engagement is prioritized, and "winning" and arguing with people drives engagement due to the dopamine hit. That's why you will constantly see rage bait promoted across social media. It makes money.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I think people crave drama. If you solved the world's problems, people would go nuts over the smallest things. You see this with HOAs and rich neighborhoods where people literally have their lives solved so they go out and make more problems for themselves. Local problems that only they can solve. People are problem solvers and when you take their problems away, they start breaking stuff.

I don't think this is just some people, I think everyone has this on some level. Some are better at finding problems to solve rather than making them. Some people start looking externally to their lives to find problems to solve and some people immediately create problems in their own life to solve. This is how you get volunteers and people contributing to society and also people complaining your lawn is too long or too brown.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That's one of the reasons I block every community/magazine focused on politics, no matter the country they're related on. Although European politics tend to be more civil than US politics. But I'm tired of too much polarization and lack of civil discourse. Tankies don't help either, and luckily for us, exploding-heads is leaving Lemmy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've felt that lemmy.world has. It feels much more like vintage Reddit.

Beehaw I haven't experienced quite as much of the arguing for arguing's sake. If someone's arguing with me, they're usually doing so in good faith.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It happens when you get more users, always. There are people who just wants to argue as some form of entertainment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Yes, and I've been using beehaw less and less because of it.

load more comments
view more: next ›