this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
202 points (98.6% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6594 readers
738 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Doesn’t matter if it’s normal soldiers, special forces or advisors serving as interpreters
r*ddit

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

My guess is that South Korea probably only will become directly involved if the US does, and frankly, if the US becomes directly involved, I think that Russia's going to either fold or play nuclear hardball, either of which kind of shuffles expanded conventional conflict out of the picture.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Russia has absolutely zero chance against the United States in a conventional war. so you're right, that they'll either capitulate, or destroy the world.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And even if that's 90% capitulate, 10% destroy the world, those aren't really odds I'm interested in taking.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

What's left in this world for you, except struggle?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The US isn't interested in direct involvement, they want infinite stalemate.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh shit.

Beyond troops, it could also open up Ukraine to South Korea's arms market. South Korea makes a ton of artillery pieces that it doesn't sell on the international market. Becoming a cobelligerent with Ukraine could change that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They also make this thing, which would be GREAT in the Ukrainian theatre, seeing as it’s only a few tons heavier than a T-90, but chock full of essentially current NATO-spec equipment. Also, Poland signed a deal for an absolute SHITLOAD of them (~1000 iirc - yes, a thousand), with local production options, so this would not only be an incredible way to get actual battlefield testing done with them, but also give the Korean arms industry a major cred boost. Not to mention, I would be unsurprised if Ukraine eventually figures out a joint production deal with South Korea, especially if the tanks perform well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

@gravitas_deficiency Both Poland and Romania will buy it, so South Korea will become a hell of a supplier on the NATO's eastern flank. We are also getting 54 K9 Thunder self-propelled howitzers from them.

@HobbitFoot

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How would they get it there though? They'd have to get across China and Russian airspace, or go a long way around.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

@sugar_in_your_tea @gravitas_deficiency on the sea. They could get it through the Pacific, then Atlantic through the Panama Straight and then on rail in Europe. Or, since the ice cap is melting, they could be shipping upwards through the Arctic Ocean.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Nobody is airlifting a tank when introducing it to the army. They will ship it to Europe and then move it through Poland, just like everything else.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

NonCredibleDefense being way too credible once more. This entire conflict has been way too weird to be non-credible about.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Oooh oooh I have bets that SK loosens restrictions on what they will export and can start power pumping out 155mm shells for Ukraine to squash their northern foe.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They've already kinda been doing that, just indirectly. Western partners have been giving their old stock of 155 to Ukraine and then resupplying with Korean made 155s.

I think a real game changer would be if they actually decided to give them access to the K2 tank. It would be interesting to see what an actual modern tank could do in Ukraine, especially considering they have layers of protection against drones and atgm. Plus they can crank them off the production line faster than any other nation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I was more meaning cut the middle man out to expedite the process..

But also, you're a fucking genius. Korean Armoured battalions when?!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is the k2 actually designed for constant combat? Ukraine seemed to really struggle with the abrams, but that's designed to have equal or greater maintenance time to fighting time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

K2 is just running on a big diesel engine, so it's not going to be as maintenance prone as the turbine on the Abrams.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I swear to God if I see a Ukrainian K2 I'm going to fucking die from cumming

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

With ERA slapped all over it 🤤

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Born too young to be a furry revolutionary in the siege of Houstonia, municipality of Texania 2049 AD

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Nah, here's their chance to sneak over the fence and pork that swine Kimmy