362
Donald Trump bears responsibility for Jan. 6 attack, Jack Smith argues in new filing
(www.nbcnews.com)
Of course he does.
this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
362 points (99.2% liked)
politics
19160 readers
4865 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Obvious truth is obvious.
RICO his ass
"You've gotta fight like hell and I'll be right there with you."
No shit.
Trump's motion to dismiss based on his claims of presidential immunity is now due Nov. 7, while the government's reply is due on Nov. 21. Whether the case ultimately goes to trial depends on the outcome of the election.
I have zero idea why Jack Smith waited so fucking long to bring this to trial. Maybe I'm missing something, but it feels like election interference to postpone court proceedings to give a candidate criminal deniability until after the election is over. If Trump really is guilty, the public deserves to know now, not after we all vote.
Jack Smith did not postpone it that late, the Supreme court and lower courts have been adding delays non-stop
He filed indictments over a year ago against trump. The more recent headlines are talking about modified versions of those indictments to work around the Supreme Court's insane rulings
His earlier case was thrown out after the Supreme Court ruled the President is immune from crimes. He had to go back do it again with only evidence from when Trump was acting as a private citizen.
Two small points-
- he brought the classified docs case earlier and that case has been dismissed pending appeal, so I don’t think the timing matters there.
- due to the Supreme Court’s interference, we are probably still a year from a verdict. They were going to help him avoid accountability no matter when the charges were brought.
Part of it was that it literally wasn’t his job for over 2 years
Garland was fucking around and didn’t appoint him until nov. 22.
He had to build his case and do all the legwork, and this is not a case you want to fuck up. Then there’s all the SCROTUS delays and bullshit there; at literally every turn.
if you guys don't understand the processes going on in the trump trials, Prosecuting Donald Trump is an excellent weekly podcast going over all court cases related to Trump. it is hosted by Andrew Weissman and Mary McCord, seasoned federal prosecutors. it's very informative and they present the content in an easily understood way.
There's also the "Jack" podcast: https://mswmedia.com/show/jack-a-special-counsel-podcast/
They go pretty deep into all the filings and maneuverings.
His supporters are selling “I’m voting for the convicted felon” merch already. Wouldn’t have made a difference, man.
Duh, Wren argues in response on lemmy.
Go listen to Mitch McConnell's speech on Jan 7th. McConnell is now considered a RINO by maga standards. It's unreal how far the Overton window has shifted to the right.
Great, we can finally see nothing be done about it.
NBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for NBC News:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/donald-trump-bears-responsibility-jan-6-attack-jack-smith-argues-new-f-rcna175707