Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
[email protected]
[email protected]
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
I was jailbreaking my iPod when I was 11 and bypassing school computer restrictions. This isn't stopping anyone. I think even a vpn would simply bypass this
you'd be surprised at the technical capability of phone generations rather than pc generations
Technical aptitude is born of need. Of course this will limit most, but at least some will figure out bypasses.
I find it crazy how the IT departments at the various schools can't seem to understand the economics of it all. The more they lock it down the more motivated the students become to break it. It also doesn't help that schools are censorship hell.
I am less concerned with stopping young people from accessing the web then with general awareness of people about the damaging mental side effects of technology.
Those side effects are usually long term, an account and a few online interactions wont harm much. But a habit will.
If my kids hacks trough my infrastructure i will shine with IT pride… and then update my infrastructure explaining them why it is i am so concerned.
I know they will find ways outside my walled garden but keeping them in was never the point, providing a safe space to live to develop healthy habits is.
I tormented the crap out of my middle schools IT guy. He couldn't figure out how I managed to bypass the GPOs. Spoiler: the group policy was at the user level which made it easy to unapply.
They may require real-world credentials for account creation to prevent that from happening.
She said the government was investigating methods of enforcing such restrictions that did not intervene with human rights, such as the requirement for a bank account.
It also gives parents assurance that they arent crazy for wanting to limit their kids access to these hell sites.
These parents should realize that they might run into it.
In a couple (maybe most at this point idk) EU countries you can use your ID in combination with your phones NFC and an open source app to prove certain parameters like age to sites, without giving up any identifying information. This is what should be used here and not fucking bank accounts.
1 - Those age restrictions work about as well as a gate with no fence
2 - Teaching kids about the dangers of social media and introducing them properly, rather than expecting them to simply abstain because the law says so (a historically very effective technique /s), would be a whole lot more productive.
That's like putting a bandaid on a sucking chest wound.
Why we continue to allow every intelligence agency, gang and terrorist organization in the entire world to have a direct line of access to our whole population is beyond me, and it's hard to explain away without assuming malice from those running our own societies.
I have no problem giving everyone access to means of socializing online. We have or have had BBS, Usenet, IRC and many more ways to do this. The problem with "social media", IMHO, are the algorithms and addictive design concepts as well as the fact that these platforms are designed to extract as much information from the user as possible. The information provided is not the product, the user is.
Well I have an absolutely massive fucking problem with giving the KGB, MS13 and ISIS access to my children online. Socializing online is a pitiful ghost of actually socializing with real people in the real world anyways.
I'm pretty sure the KGB are not the ones you should be concerned about.
...KGB, MS13 and ISIS...
If you are worried about the KGB, then your kids are pushing middle age. The problem is not the defunct agency, the random thugs or the illiterate terrorists. The true scary is the systemic syphoning of every detail about you by giant corporations which is then sold off, legally, in the open market. If you don't want children exposed to Internet, don't get them a smart phone or a computer. Sadly, not knowing how to navigate apps or websites would likely hinder their ability to function in today's and probably tomorrow's society.
Care to use words to express why you think having a problem with that is laughable? Just guessing, but if you think pretending they disbanded means they don't actually exist anymore, you ought to know that a KGB agent is literally running their country now.
Refresh
You can care about both issues fyi. Frankly pretending those things aren't a serious threat makes me wonder about who you are. You can't even discuss those other problems online as things are, without such bad faith actors injecting themselves into the conversation and muddying the waters.
How in the world is the KGB, an institution disbanded before HTML was created, a problem for anyone on the Internet? MS13 and ISIS are fringe examples used as boogiemen to obfuscate and distract. Anyway, the point of the laughter was the use of KGB. Is the Stasi tapping iPhones?
I’m calling it now, ISIS and MS13 aren’t chatting with your kids. Prove me wrong.
Great hope it helps
Should raise minimum age to 500
All in favor upvote
kids will easily find ways around this, and social medias will facilitate it
aka nothing will change whatsoever
Properly motivated ones will find a way around it. Those just clicking out of habit might not be assed to. If the whole point is zoning out, being asked to perform intellectual labour to access it is counterproductive to the urge.
Is it just me or do is there a unusual amount of hexbear users in this post? Maybe it is just by chance.
yea, one properly motivated one will figure out how to do it, then show all the can't be assed ones
Dude pirating movies is a two step process and most people who know how to do it and used to do it no longer do because mumbling “Netflix” into your audio remote is easier.
I can understand the intent behind this, but I wonder if it will actually prevent kids bypassing these restrictions. Much less, in my own country minors that shouldn’t be on platforms have public accounts.
Without proper enforcement of such restrictions and/or actual technical solutions to enforce this on the user’s end, this is just feel-good signaling.
"This legislation is sponsored and brought to you by our good friends over at NordVPN..."
(Joke made to sound like the standard Youtuber sponsor intro)
Yeah, sure, man. I haven't looked much into social media when I was 13, and had seen porn ads and ran into surprise things. Looking back, I don't think I needed this nanny thing.
The law isn't for you
The point is I do not think they need that much protection. Better education is the solution.
Predatory molesters like zuckerberg wont be stopped by that.
