this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
429 points (88.8% liked)

Technology

59091 readers
4565 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

OK, its just a deer, but the future is clear. These things are going to start kill people left and right.

How many kids is Elon going to kill before we shut him down? Whats the number of children we're going to allow Elon to murder every year?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 181 points 5 days ago (7 children)

The poster, who pays Tesla CEO Elon Musk for a subscription to the increasingly far-right social media site, claimed that the FSD software “works awesome” and that a deer in the road is an “edge case.” One might argue that edge cases are actually very important parts of any claimed autonomy suite, given how drivers check out when they feel the car is doing the work, but this owner remains “insanely grateful” to Tesla regardless.

How are these people always such pathetic suckers.

[–] [email protected] 114 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I grew up in Maine. Deer in the road isn’t an edge case there. It’s more like a nightly occurrence.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Same in Kansas. Was in a car that hit one in the 80s and see them often enough that I had to avoid one that was crossing a busy interstste highway last week.

Deer are the opposite of an edge case in the majority of the US.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Putting these valid points aside we're also all just taking for granted that the software would have properly identified a human under the same circumstances..... This could very easily have been a much more chilling outcome

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

I'm not taking that for granted. If it can't tell a solid object os in the road, I would guess that would be true for a human that is balled up or facing away as well.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 days ago

Being a run of the mill fascist (rather than those in power) is actually an incredibly submissive position, they just want strong daddies to take care of them and make the bad people go away. It takes courage to be a "snowflake liberal" by comparison

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago

Edge cases (NOT features) are the thing that keeps them from reaching higher levels of autonomy. These level differences are like "most circumstances", "nearly all circumstances", "really all circumstances".

Since Tesla cares so much more about features, they will remain on level 2 for another very long time.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Deer on the road is an edge case that humans cannot handle well. In general every option other than hitting the deer is overall worse - which is why most insurance companies won't increase your rates if you hit a deer and file a claim for repairs.

The only way to not hit/kill hundreds of deer (thousands? I don't know the number) every year is to reduce rural speed limits to unreasonably slow speeds. Deer jump out of dark places right in front of cars all the time - the only option to avoid it that might work is either drive in the other lanes (which sometimes means into an oncoming car), or into the ditch (you have no clue what might be there - if you are lucky the car just rolls, but there could be large rocks or strong fence posts and the car stops instantly. Note that this all happens fast, you can't think you only get to react. Drivers in rural areas are taught to hit the brakes and maintain their lane.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 5 days ago (32 children)

Drivers in rural areas are taught to hit the brakes and maintain their lane.

Which the Tesla didn't do. It plowed full speed into the deer, which arguably made the collision much much worse than it could have been. I doubt the thing was programmed to maintain speed into a deer. The more likely alternative is that the FSD couldn't tell there was a deer there in the first place.

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The problem is not that the deer was hit, a human driver may have done so as well. The actual issue is that the car didn't do anything to avoid hitting it. It didn't even register that the deer was there and, what's even worse, that there was an accident. It just continued on as if nothing happened.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, the automated system should be better than a human. That is the whole point of collision detection systems!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Deer jump out of dark places

that one was just standing there, yo

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

If tesla also used radar or other sensing systems instead of limiting themselves to only cameras then being in the dark wouldn't be an issue.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Only keeping the regular cameras was a genius move to hold back their full autonomy plans

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The day he said that "ReGULAr CAmErAs aRe ALl YoU NeEd" was the day I lost all trust in their implementation. And I'm someone who's completely ready to turn over all my driving to an autopilot lol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

I notice nobody has commented on the fact that the driver should've reacted to the deer. It's not Tesla's responsibility to emergency brake, even if that is a feature in the system. Drivers are responsible for their vehicle's movements at the end of the day.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago

Then it's not "Full self driving". It's at best lane assistance, but I wouldn't trust that either.

Elon needs to shut the fuck up about self driving and maybe issue a full recall, because he's going to get people killed.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

That would be lovely if it wasn't called and marketed as Full Self-Driving.

You sell vaporware/incomplete functionality software and release it into the wild, then you are responsible for all the chaos it brings.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Driving is full of edge cases. Humans are also bad drivers who get edge cases wrong all the time.

The real question isn't is Tesla better/worse in anyone in particular, but overall how does Tesla compare. If a Tesla is better in some situations and worse in others and so overall just as bad as a human I can accept it. Is Tesla is overall worse then they shouldn't be driving at all (If they can identify those situations they can stop and make a human take over). If a Tesla is overall better then I'll accept a few edge cases where they are worse.

Tesla claims overall they are better, but they may not be telling the truth. One would think regulators have data for the above - but they are not talking about it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Tesla claims overall they are better, but they may not be telling the truth. One would think regulators have data for the above - but they are not talking about it.

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/nhtsa-opens-probe-into-24-mln-tesla-vehicles-over-full-self-driving-collisions-2024-10-18/

The agency is asking if other similar FSD crashes have occurred in reduced roadway visibility conditions, and if Tesla has updated or modified the FSD system in a way that may affect it in such conditions.

It sure seems like they aren't being very forthcoming with their data between this and being threatened with fines last year for not providing the data. That makes me suspect they still aren't telling the truth.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The autopilot knows deers can't sue

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Deer aren’t edge cases. If you are in a rural community or the suburbs, deer are a daily way of life.

As more and more of their forests are destroyed, deer are a daily part of city life. I live in the middle of a large midwestern city; in neighborhood with houses crowded together. I see deer in my lawn regularly.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Is there video that actually shows it "keeps going"? The way that video loops I know I can't tell what happens immediately after.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

For the 1000th time Tesla: don't call it "autopilot" when it's nothing more than a cruise control that needs constant attention.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

It is autopilot (a poor one but still one) that legally calls itself cruise control so Tesla wouldn't have to take responsibility when it inevitably breaks the law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why does this read like an ad for cybertrucks for people who would want to run over deer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

the deer is not blameless. those bastards will race you to try and cross in front of you.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Finally someone else familiar with the most deadly animal in North America.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

I'd give the moose the top spot. Maybe not in sheer numbers of deaths, but I'd much rather have an encounter with a deer than a moose.

Though for sheer number, I also wouldn't give that to deer, that spot would go to humans, though I can admit it's a bit pedantic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Tesla’s approach to automotive autonomy is a unique one: Rather than using pesky sensors, which cost money, the company has instead decided to rely only on the output from the car’s cameras. Its computers analyze every pixel, crunch through tons of data, and then apparently decide to just plow into deer and keep on trucking.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I mean, to be honest...if you are about to hit a deer on the road anyway, speed up. Higher chance the scrawny fucker will get yeeted over you after meeting your car, rather than get juuuuust perfectly booped into air to crash through windshield and into your face.

Official advice I heard many times. Prolly doesn't apply if you are going slow.

Edit: Read further down. This advice is effing outdated, disregard. -_- God I am happy I've never had to put it i to test.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That deer was pushing the woke agenda!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Elon's Death

For a brief moment, I was so excited... Rip deer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It was an illegal deer immigrant, it recognised it, added it to the database on Tesla servers, and mowed it down before it took any jobs or whatever the hate-concern was.

/s

... but some actual technically human people do the same when they see an animal, don't they?
:(

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›