this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
189 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19160 readers
4660 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 days ago

Well, yeah. Welcome to working for a tech billionaire.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

complete with a nondisclosure agreement

Those are a scourge.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

NDA's are basically financial terrorism in their current state; not the competition enabler and anti-espionage tool they're made out to be.

They basically equal the threat of "You aren't allowed to tell the truth about any unethical, immoral, or criminal actions you witness or engage in under threat of financial destruction by a corporate legal team"

The NDA obviously doesn't state it for criminal actions, but either way it results in a chilling effect on the whistleblowing of all suspected criminal actions.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Some of these canvassers didn’t even know what they were signing up for. Many of them were driven around in the back of U-Haul vans without seatbelts. Pretty sad all around

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

Call it what it is... human trafficking.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

Members of the face eating party surprised that leopards ate their face

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

Christ on a cracker I'm not shocked in the least but damn.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Jeez. Cult members being treated badly but still probably love their golden man? Call me shocked.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Nobody deserves to be abused.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Noooooooo waaaaay /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Holy shit. I think they tried to talk to me today. The speed at which NO THANK YOU GOODBYE came out of my mouth surprised even me.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 days ago

Raw Story - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Raw Story:

Wiki: unreliable - There is consensus that Raw Story is generally unreliable for factual reporting, based upon a pattern of publishing false and sensationalized stories. Editors almost unanimously agree that the source is biased and that in-text attribution should accompany each use of the source.


MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.rawstory.com/america-pac-2669545160/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support