this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
212 points (83.3% liked)

Political Memes

5402 readers
2440 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I'm going to vote 3rd party to send whoever is running against Hitler a message!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Unironically the correct thing to do, historically speaking. It was the "lesser evil" candidate who won and appointed Hitler as chancellor, which allowed him to seize power.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unironically the correct thing to do, historically speaking. It was the “lesser evil” candidate who won and appointed Hitler as chancellor, which allowed him to seize power.

"If only they hadn't rallied around the lesser evil candidate, then the Nazis could've gotten into power even earlier!" - MLs, unironically, it would seem. Unless you've forgotten who Hindenburg was running against.

Fucking insane. Wanting Nazism to come into power as soon as possible so it can start murdering people even earlier. Just mask-off fascism from you lot, huh?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

They're the sort of .ml user who is so deep into the propaganda they deny China has done any human rights abuses at all (and none to Uyghurs in specific). It's hard to consider anything they write as good faith.

And, indeed, if I look it up, it leads me to wonder: if the NSDAP were not the largest party in the Reichstag at the time (perhaps one means of this happening would have been people voting for lesser evils!) it may not have happened.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

what exactly are you talking about? Hitler became chancellor because the NSDAP had the largest support (~30%), he won because no one wanted to support the "lesser evil", imagine if all the left-wing micro parties actually put together and voted just the SPD or KPD, it would literally have stopped Hitler.

yes, Hitler happened because people refused to vote for the "lesser evil" because the ASPD, the KAPD, USPD, KPO, etc... couldn't vote for the SPD

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In the 1932 German Presidential Election, the candidates were Hitler, Hindenburg, and Thälmaan. The SPD endorsed "center-right" Hindenburg as a lesser evil to stop Hitler, and he won. Then he wound up appointing Hitler as chancellor anyway.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

and it got to that point after the conservatives already pulled a bunch of voter suppression and the 1933 election where the Nazis got most of the votes, and because the left vote was split, their combine greater total meant nothing

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago

Sure. Obviously, the split on the left was unfortunate and a major reason why Hitler came to power. Another reason being the declining economic conditions under the governing coalition of the SPD with the center-right.

I don't really see how that makes the case for lesser-evilism.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's like you're trying to tell us "nach Hitler kommen Wir" was a bad idea?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I'm sorry, I don't speak French.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If that fellow were dumb enough to be one of the usual suspects on Lemmy, he would respond with "Yes, I see no difference between you and the SPD, which I also find antisemitic."

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm sitting this election out because Vogel gave up his pacifism during the Great War! Both sides are the same. I'm very smart.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

I'd much rather have someone who's never been a pacifist! At least they're consistent!!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I'd much rather have someone who was never a pacifist to begin with! At least they're consistent!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You mean the SPD that used the Freikorps to crush the communist Spartacus League? The Freikorps that went on to aid Hitler in his rise to power? The SPD who prevented a communist revolution that could have prevented the rise of fascism in the first place? That SPD?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You mean the SPD that used the Freikorps to crush the communist Spartacus League?

Ah yes, when the Spartacus League decided "Fuck democracy, we can pull a coup" and were surprised by the fact that the military, fresh from the front, was not fond of the idea.

The Freikorps that went on to aid Hitler in his rise to power?

The Freikorps were all-but-disbanded by '21, Einstein. Wanna remind me when Hitler came to power?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

"However, many Freikorps also largely despised the Republic and were involved in assassinations of its supporters, later aiding the Nazis in their rise to power." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freikorps

Voting hasn't had a good record at stopping fascism fyi

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Is the single issue voting against the person who praises Hitler, repeatedly has Nazi imagery in their ads, defends racists who "want to make America hate again", and is supported by literal Nazis?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Hey Turbonics I heard you still support Trump

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This argument by democrats targeting "single issue voters" who don't exist is absurd. Like the democrats aren't also terrible on environmental policies, they also support police and border violence and on and on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

This is a messging problem, not underlying policies eaxh party makes, from what I gather. "Enemy within" vs a wider range of issues