this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
447 points (100.0% liked)

196

16423 readers
2967 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Learning about religion in school isn't necessarily a bad thing. We studied the major religions, Buddhism, pantheism, and to a lesser degree minor religions as a part of social studies in 7th grade. I think it was the first time anyone actually told me there were 'options' other than Christianity. More importantly, it helped me understand where others are coming from even though I don't share their faith. If it's approached from a purely educational standpoint I think religion does have a place in school - and I'm an atheist. We just shouldn't be presenting any of it as fact or "right" when it's all a matter of opinion, nor teaching them about any one specific religion and excluding others.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (8 children)

...But that's not what Christian nationalists are working towards. They want to teach their religion, not teach about all religion.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Exactly basically what the poster above is talking about is the ideals of faith

MAGATS want to teach religion / organized religion

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Teaching all religions is definitely important. Teaching that christian creationism is just as likely/plausible as evolution is a big problem

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

As a Christian, I couldn't agree more! Let the kid learn about the different religious beliefs! I've been learning about otherreligionns and they are all pretty cool!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I'm against religion as an organized institution that influences the world on a daily basis, but fuck comparative mythology is cool as hell. Thanks to it we got Morrowind's amazing lore, since it was one of Kirkbride's fields of study in college.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe we should teach religion in schools under two contexts. Historical mythology (Made up stuff from the past people incorrectly believed in) and Current mythology (Made up stuff that people currently incorrectly believe in).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The question/problemmatic part about current stuff is who decides what counts as "current mythology". Even scientific doctrine is disproven (cause that's the best part about science).

Now, I totally see Historical mythology being a great class.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I mean, dude comes back from the dead, dude lives in the belly of whale, snakes talk, all animals on earth on a boat........Do we really need laboratories and Phd's to pore over these matters to call them mythology? I think science has more pressing matters to deal with rather than debunk fairytales. No?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It feels quite strange reading this as a Jewish person.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nothing against the meme, but boy do I hate wojacks. They're aesthetically unpleasing and something about them makes them obviously 4chan

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I like them because they have a consistent style and can represent so many types of people (strawmen)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

For me it's those stupid ass expressions

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This post is arguing that we should not allow people to fucking quote: "freely worship their god" to prevent being sent to an internment camp, and you incels are eating it up.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how does this have anything to do with incels?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

brah don't you know, it's not hateful if it is a joke and i was only joking brah

braaaaah it's just a joke and jokes doesn't mean anything lighten up braaaaaah

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You lifted one word out of my comment and focused on that single word that had nothing to do with the actual point so you could avoid any acknowledging the criticism. I'm not playing your stupid games. I don't accept for a moment you're engaging in good faith, sorry.

If you don't want to talk about why this was a shitty, hateful thing to post, nobody is forcing you to talk to me, buddy. Just go on with your life and try no to hurt anyone else.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'd be more willing to engage with criticism if you didn't use words that don't make sense in this context, leading me to believe you don't know what you're talking about.

It's not shitty or hateful, your anger is the intended outcome; this is a satirical edit of a Christian hate-meme to display how hateful it is when applied to Christians

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is it? I mean it clearly references it, but unless I'm not getting something, that's a hateful meme slurring transgenderism, and this is a hateful meme slurring religion. If either of them are intended ironically, they're cutting pretty damn close to the Poe line. I'm not seeing any parody.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As far as I'm concerned, it's pretty funny! I understand some people may take this seriously and that's sad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't say anything about whether or not it is funny. Do you have any comment on whether or not it is hateful?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Ok, it's not hateful unless you think it is.

To me, that's funny. I understand that some people can take this seriously and come to think that what the meme is saying is actually happening which may bring more harm than good.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All that’s missing is the “You are here” pointer at the second to last step.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Lol. Ty now I understand. 😆

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's ridiculous. American politicians literally swear on the bible as they assume office and then quote bible verses on the job and then they expect us to believe we're anywhere other than at that second from last step?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When step 2 intersects with capitalism, all the other stuff just naturally follows. Sure there are people who legitimately want to help people (read an article about 2 Christians giving up their high paying jobs to spend their time making affordable housing for the poor and indigenous people) but they're increasingly becoming the minority.

That said, money based religions are only one oppressive group that bands together for profit and control. Religions aren't much different than political parties (hence the smashup between many) and corporations, organized crime, etc.

Human nature, rather than being inherently good, tends to be inherently bad. Hence why most giant groups tend to be oppressive by nature. It's why I believe that there shouldn't be giant concentrations of wealth and power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Cringe comment tbh. Religion is a net neutral institution. It can be nudged in any direction. Majority atheist states are not less oppressive than majority religious states. America does have a uniquely large amount of Christianity-inspired cults tho. I would say this more of an indicator of America's failing/non-existent social systems, rather than an inheritant feature of religion.

Cults, mafias and corrupt monopolies exist primarily, when the state fails at least in one key area. They act as competitors of the state. Competition in science, art and economy is great. In governance, competition means public chaos and oppression. Multi-party democracies are the only exceptions (to some extent).

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I was taught about Islam in social studies, and I don't remember anybody trying to force me to obey Islamic law at any point.

I don't know whether there is a slippery slope, but I do know this isn't an accurate description of it.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Person: here is generally how this thing has gone throughout history

You: my individual experience doesn't match this, therefore you are completely wrong

Come on, dude, read a book.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

He never said that they were "completely wrong". Just casting doubt/sharing thoughts. Regardless, freedom of/from religion has only gotten better in the west for the last few hundred years. Please don't let a few crazies in the US determine your perspective on an entire religion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Throughout history, most people didn't go to school at all, let alone get taught about other religions (other than “if anyone claims to believe this, kill them”).

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are some states passing laws mandating "in god we trust" be placed somewhere prominent in the school. There's an argument to be made that by doing this, the states are mandating that education systems must promote the the idea of the Bible and it's claims being true.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That goes a tad beyond merely teaching kids about religions.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

that'sthepoint.jpg

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

This post is talking about the dominant religion in countries where the dominant religion is far too dominant.

Of course you can study other religions from time to time, because that doesn't disrupt the dominant one. In fact, depending on how closely religion and patriotism are linked in a given place sometimes other religions can be used as a way to dismiss the relevance or importance of life in other countries.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Were you taught in a predominantly Islamic country?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The United States, so no.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

This, but unironically

load more comments
view more: next ›