this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

D&D Next - 5e Discussion

2391 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss the latest version of Dungeons & Dragons, the fifth edition, known during the playtest as D&D Next.

Join our discord! https://discord.gg/dndnext

-- Rules --

  1. Be Civil. Unacceptable behavior includes name calling, taunting, baiting, flaming, etc. Please respect the opinions of people who play differently than you do.
  2. Use Clear, Concise Titles.
  3. Limit Self-Promotional Links. External links to blogs, kickstarters, storefronts, YouTube channels, etc, must be related to DnD and posted no more than once every 14 days. Affiliate links are never allowed.

This is a new community and the rules are in flux. Please bear with us (and give your feedback!) as we navigate building this new community. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I stand by the opinion that this should've been "Tasha's Cauldron of More Things" instead of the PHB 2.0.

Fingers crossed that the changes to the MM and the DMG are more substantial.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That was the original promise before the playtests, No new edition.
They are afraid of splitting the fanbase with a new edition, so anything too different will be scrapped.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I do expect to see the dungeon masters guide changed substantially. We've heard tales that the product was rushed and designed alongside the players handbook with priority on the latter. In addition it is filled with much fewer rules that would cause chaos to change; It doesn't matter if they change encounter rules to match modern guidance or if magic items aren't right in the middle of if the guidance on setting building changes.

The PHB revision has written itself into a corner by their design goals clearly changing during production to keep the 2014 edition totally compatible instead of adaptable, the other products already are not beholden to that ethos because there is less comparability overall.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I backed MCDM's Flee, Mortals. While they can't use Wizards monsters so there's a lot of change in lore and names, it's so good that I don't think I'll ever need a Wizards updated MM.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Fingers crossed that the changes to the MM and the DMG are more substantial.

To be honest if its gonna take really any effort at all to learn a new edition, myself (and I think a lot of other DMs) are going to look very seriously at other D&D-alike games.

Shadow of the Weird Wizard, the new MCDM RPG, Shadowdark, Pathfinder 2e, the new Kobold Press RPG (is it still called Black Flag?), etc etc.

There has never been a better time to look at other tabletop RPGs as it seems for once WotC have a load of real competition.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Im a bit late to this party hahaha I like what they did to Eldritch Knight, pretty good quality of life changes

But

Im sure that im moving to Level up advanced 5e now, all these changes are too conservative for what I was expecting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Warlock is looking much better for many multiclasses, while it's discouraged on other classes by moving the subclass to L3. I wonder if that's accidental or on purpose.

A single level dip could give you 1 pact/invocation.

And a 2 level dip 3 pacts/invocations.