this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
115 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

12 readers
1 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 2 years ago
 

From its recent rulings to its billionaire donor scandals, this supreme court term has been defined by judicial activist Leonard Leo

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As the Lever helped expose last year, Leo’s judicial activism was supercharged in 2021 when a conservative surge protector magnate secretly funneled $1.6bn to his new dark money fund – the largest known political advocacy donation in US history.
Even the design of the student debt case reeks of Leo’s involvement, since just like the Colorado suit, it appears to have been based on DC machinations. As the Lever reported, the student loan servicer at the heart of the case – whom Republican attorneys general argued would be harmed by Biden’s student loan plan – would in reality face no financial harm at all.

The US has a serious problem about the impartiality of the SCOTUS. Dems not going hard to fix the problem is not helping the situation. Future of US Legal System is not looking good for the average Joe.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine what the Rs would do if the same scandal leaked for D judges.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They lose their minds of absolutely anything, so my guess is that they would ‘lose their minds’.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Americans are finally starting to figure out that corruption is alive and well here.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I doubt anyone has had impressions of the US government otherwise, though the popular view of lobbyists handing out bags of cash is very shallow. What is new is viewing the supreme court as not being above the fray. That's also the sort of genie that doesn't go back into the bag.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You would be incorrect. A lot of Americans have long held this idea that other countries have a lot of corruption (not all of them, but some) in a way that the US surely never could.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Arm yourselves and organize. Politicians aren't going to bite the hand that feeds them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can anyone explain to me how guns will help if the national guard is at your door? Or the military? Do people really think that they could go to war against the United States because the US government becomes overrun by fascists?

At worst you'll be labeled a terrorist and immediately murdered. Even if you ignore the military, brandishing a gun Infront of a cop is a death sentence (if you aren't white).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The black panthers are really the best example of the (few) benefits and many costs of armed community defense. It's much worse now, too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Actually guns are bad and you should feel bad. Only the state security forces should be armed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Right blames something on Soros: lol one man doesn’t have that much power

But this dude is totally pulling all the strings of the government, the king of dark money, got it

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Remember bribing Supreme Court Justices is exactly like literacy programs and organizing to expand voting rights.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The left doesn't say that one man doesn't have the power to pull strings, the left says that there's no evidence of Soros doing it.

A subtle distinction, but an important one.

Leonard Leo literally hand-picked every judge that Donald Trump appointed, all 234 of them, including 3 supreme court justices.

Leo then paid for nonsense cases to be filed in jurisdictions with friendly (read his own hand-picked) judges. These cases were all based on lies. Because it never mattered if there was any truth to them. They then get kicked up the chain to Leo's hand-picked supreme court, where the justices rule how Leo wanted from the beginning. Well, 3 hand-picked, and 1 bribed, all that's needed from there is to get Alito to fall in line, and that man has Fox News brain so bad that it's scary.

And that's how one man can shape the law in any way he wants, even if congress and the presidency are controlled by Democrats

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You don't have to say it's subtle. It's far from that to people who can read.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

The classic "why don't people agree with me when I try to blame Jews for global conspiracies?"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That's a nice straw man you made there. Unless, of course, you're specifically aware of anyone in this thread making that argument.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The upside of this dystopia we live in is headlines like this, which make it seem like a fun fantasy dystopia rather than a dull christofascist one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Earl Warren is spinning so fast in his grave they could use him to power the east coast

load more comments
view more: next ›