this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
318 points (97.9% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 152 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

The only acceptable number, but not only in Europe, everywhere, is “0”.

And if you already don’t know why: a billionaire has way too much money and power, and can influence governments in their favor, creating unsurmountable inequality and subverting the system’s rules. Billionaires are the cause why capitalism is failing (and since no one can stop them now, it will completely fail, and will drag the environment, and human survival, with it).

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but capitalism isn't failing: billionaires ARE capitalism

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When I say capitalism is failing is because for it to work, it need rules (offer/demand, competition without monopolies, etc), that these billionaires have eliminated or subverted. They changed the game rules in their favor, and are now so powerful it’s impossible to stop them (non violently, I mean). I honestly think we just entered a dark era of humanity, one in which its existence is in question. And yes, I’m a pessimist, but I try to be optimistic with all my might, but everything I see or read prevents me from being optimistic.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

When I say capitalism is failing is because for it to work, it need rules

Because it is unstable. It is much easier to disrupt the system than to balance it in a stable-like state against it's nature. Capitalism has gotten out of hand and will collapse sooner or later. And no: I am not a pessimist

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago

I think the better comparison would be the number of billionaires per capita. Say, per million people. Not that this isn’t a good infographic - keep the overall count. But include the per capita as a frequency-of-occurrence stat.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We need an EU wide 100% wealth tay for any wealth over say 15million€. I am willing to negotiate about the second number.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Tay them all!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So anyone who gets a certain amount of money might as well close all the companies they own?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Or give them to the employees or something. Probably 15M is a too low threshold to enforce that but it would work. It would basically distribute the wealth amongst the people who produce it

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Maybe not 15 million, but let's say at 100 million you get a dog park named after you with a statue that says you won at capitalism

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didnt knew this Graph but damn..

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

And this is why you could tax them at 80 or even 90% and they would still have more money than 90% of the rest of the population of earth.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago

That's a lot of food to eat. Better get started.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trickle down economics works like a piñata. Once you break it open with blunt force, the stuff you want starts to trickle down!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Only 3 in Monaco ? *suspicious*

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

There’s some bookkeeping sorcery going on there, gotta be

Also: why’s it yellow? It’s got 3, so it should be green

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] galoisghost 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s a lot of guillotines

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Even if we had to use a private submarine for each one it would still be worth it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Be environmentally minded please and follow the three R’s. In this case we simply reuse the same guilotine.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

It would make more sense to use per capita numbers.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These are eatable numbers

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Am I the only one who finds the color scheme unintuitive? (a comment more suitable for DataIsBeautiful, probably)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's a barrier free color scheme. I like it tbh

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

It’s important to remember that while all billionaires are bastards, some are just evil because they take value they neither earned nor need, meanwhile others got rich off being the family whose spat between cousins was WWI and are actively working to undermine left wing and pro equality movements literally today including conspiring to push bigotry towards lgbt people to distract from the class war

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Is this based on nationality (defined as: has that nations passport) or billionaires actually living in that country? Because probably many billionaires don't live in their home country or pay taxes there

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Portugal's only billionaire might be Abramovich, who gained PT nationality through a very dubious program

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

didn't know we had so many billionaires!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How the fuck is there so many and can we eat some?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The one billionair in Estonia:

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It's John Travolta in pulp fiction looking around not finding anyone

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Another reason why Portugal is doing it right

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Not really, we might have only one billionaire, but all the millionaires are very greedy, as well as the upper clear as a whole. Combining that greed with the sky rocketing cost of living, mainly due to digital nomads and airbnb, we're certainly not an example. Just a collapse waiting to happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Surprising that monaco "only" has 3 billionaires.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›