this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
-1 points (33.3% liked)

politics

19094 readers
3717 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I had hope that this community would be a place where free thinkers would congregate and have open discussions about political issues. But at first glance it looks like a exact copy of r/politics. I lean left on the political scale but the constant republican/trump bashing is tiresome. Seems like this community has succumbed to the same fate. If I wanted heavy bias, I would just watch any major news station. Any suggestions on communities that discuss politics as a whole? Perhaps with an observatory viewpoint rather than a partisan one.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I feel a same. The Reddit exodus is not going to help things. All the r/politics users are going to move to c/politics.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, that is the destiny of virtually every social media subreddit, chat room, or other group.

People tend to want to congregate with like-minded people, and it becomes especially easy for that to quickly devolve from a social group into an echo chamber. And as echo chambers grow and evolve, they tend to disapprove of dissenting opinions more and more. Anybody who has a dissenting opinion or otherwise is even willing to admit that maybe the other side has a point once in a while will quickly be seen as "traitors to the cause". If you are not 100% with "us", then you are 100% with "them". There is no in between.

If this place takes off, the same will happen here. Subworlds, or whatever they're called on here, will all have their own little niches with their own little echo chambers and their own little tribalism. It's been that way since the dawn of social media, and it's been that way since the dawn of time.

It is ironic that the internet was developed so people could hear and share ideas, and instead everybody largely just sought out their own little echo chambers. And even if you do find a small group of like minded individuals, that group is itself the exact echo chamber it seeks to avoid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No, it’s not. You’re not an enlightened tolerant and rational human being by claiming both sides are equally at fault.

Just one example: I’d agree with you, if both sides would make equally as many false claims. But that's not the case..

It’s not “Only your side is bad and my side is good”. There ARE liars on both sides. But that shouldn’t lead to the conclusion that both sides are telling equally as much lies.

Why is that so important? Because you would totally miss out on the rhetorical tactics they use to push their agenda. Take Trump’s caravan, Hunter’s laptop, false election claims. All of them were lies, but had a massive impact. Show me equally as bad examples the Democrats use to push their narrative.

Also, you can check, if you are open minded or not with the help of something called falsifiability. Ask yourself:

  1. What kind of proof would change my mind about this?
  2. Is there substantial proof?
  3. (Don’t) change your mind.
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

First, please mark as [Meta] next time, as this would be remove for a violation of rule 1. But this is just a nitpick.

It'll be hard to regulate constant republican/trump bashing. They're so many news sources just bashing them for there problems. I'll feature this to have a discussion in the comments on what to change. Right now it's just an emulation of r/politics to allow migrating redditors feel at home in this community. But if you want change then let's see what change you guys want and see if it's a good idea.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I agree, regulating would be impossible due to nature of open discussion. I was just hoping that Lemmy would be like Reddit was 10 years ago. Its just such low hanging fruit and doesnt add to developing a discussion. Sorry about the format I wasnt sure if this type of post would even be allowed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You might be the catalyst to stop that from happening. Just list all the ways that Republicans are improving life every day in this great country.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds good to me. Still testing apps and settling in.

I’d welcome any debate grounded in reality supported by established science and facts.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I'll keep an eye out for any new communities and let you know if I find any. Please do the same

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I too lean left and I absolutely agree that the constant bashing from both sides is really annoying. This also doesn't apply to american politics only (I'm from Germany).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Politics have turned into some weird twisted show of "see how bad the other party is" instead of "see what good our party has done." Its surely is a circus and the public eats it up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the Republicans are aggressively pushing this tribal culture war and it never should get normalized. They deserve to get called out on it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it’s not. You’re not an enlightened tolerant and rational human being by claiming both sides are equally at fault.

Just one example: I’d agree with you, if both sides would make equally as many false claims. But that's not the case..

It’s not “Only your side is bad and my side is good”. There ARE liars on both sides. But that shouldn’t lead to the conclusion that both sides are telling equally as much lies.

Why is that so important? Because you would totally miss out on the rhetorical tactics they use to push their agenda. Take Trump’s caravan, Hunter’s laptop, false election claims. All of them were lies, but had a massive impact. Show me equally as bad examples the Democrats use to push their narrative.

Also, you can check, if you are open minded or not with the help of something called falsifiability. Ask yourself:

  1. What kind of proof would change my mind about this?
  2. Is there substantial proof?
  3. (Don’t) change your mind.
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

I dont know if you were triggered or just needed to vent, but could you please stay on topic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Democrats are trying to say "see what good our party has done". The problem is that the Republicans are shouting "See how bad the other party is" much, much louder.

Doesn't matter how much of an adult you are trying to be. The screaming baby on the other side of the room that's pulling a constant temper tantrum and throwing his toys around wildly is the one that's going to get the attention.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

In context of this post and the context of this community, that is not the case. Look at the frontpage and tell me that with a straight face.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Free thinkers do tend to bash bigoted authoritarian-following thinkers. If mods removed all partisan comments in a political subreddit or instance community, there'd be a sharp drop in thread activity. I think it's fine having a mix of objective anaylsis and partisan opinion. I felt that way even back in my Republican days.

Edit: minor corrections.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think you answered my question.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

After letting this post marinate for a week, I can confidently say that this community is in fact just a clone of the biased echo camber that is r/politics. Im all for relevant news on politics but this isnt the place for that. Every post on the frontpage can be summed up as "republicans bad."(except the one about Jake Paul's energy drink lol) The world is too big to have such a narrow view. Lemmians, lemmitors, lemmitarians... stop buying in to the 2 party system. Look at the issue not the party tied to it.