this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
341 points (95.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9583 readers
336 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i detest signs like these with such a burning passion, they show that people want their streets to be safe but cannot be arsed to actually get them to be made safer, so they put up a sign as if that's going to do jack shit.

If you want people to drive safely, get the local government to traffic calm the street, if nothing else it's common for there to be a procedure for getting permission to place some flower boxes on the street to make your own traffic calming.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'd go even farther than that: I'd argue that those signs are an admission of incompetence by the engineer who approved their installation.

I'm becoming more and more convinced that the path towards improving the situation is to directly target the engineers themselves by going after the license of those who fail to design streets appropriately for all users. Even if they follow established government guidelines or industry best practices, that shouldn't be a defense because the guidelines and best practices are wrong to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

somehow soldiers can't use "i was just following orders" to defend murder but engineers can.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Whenever I see signs that say something like “children live here” I just think “okay? And what if I hate children?” Maybe I’ll just drive faster then.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Classic

Edit: At least the driver had the courtesy to park it on the side, albeit with the wheels facing the wrong way 😳

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

"You can't park here"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Who says they weren't? You should see when they don't drive carefully.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You can't park here mate

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

What is that red lump there? Is that some piece of meat?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There is no better demonstration of how much safety a sign like that creates, than this photo ...