If they do it this way, they can sell a 60fps version for full price in a couple of years.
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)
Starfield
2860 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!
- Follow instance rules (no spam, keep it civil and respectful, be constructive, tag NSFW)
Helpful links:
Spoiler policy:
- No spoilers in titles; if you want to share images with spoilers, preferably post the image in the body of the post. If you do make an image post, mark it NSFW.
- Add
[Spoilers]to your title if there will be untagged spoilers in the post. - Game mechanics and general discoveries (ship parts, weapons, etc) don't need a spoiler tag.
- Details about questlines and other story related content are spoilers. Use your best judgement!
Post & comment spoiler syntax:
<spoiler here>
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Big oof. Seems like it will be hard to run on PC too. The recommended GPU is a 2080. My 3080 is kinda sweating at that because I assume that they mean 30fps @ high settings with a 2080.
Such a shame. I understand not wanting to compromise on details and graphics, but 60fps should be the bare minimum any developer is happy with in 2023.
Just curious for your thoughts, nothing bad intended. How would you feel about console graphic settings? Not as granular as PC but like, “30FPS and beautiful” or “60FPS and toned down graphics”.
Given the choice, what would you pick?
100% 60 fps and toned down
older games are often still played a lot nowadays, and art direction is way more important than resolution and the like
honestly the immense focus in polygon and pixel counts in games lately has annoyed me immensely, especially because they rarely actually make for a stand-out look