this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
1209 points (98.5% liked)

Superbowl

3213 readers
296 users here now

For owls that are superb.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Americans are goofy af "criss cross applesauce" bitch that don't even rhyme

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Am American, I know the phrase criss cross applesauce, but have never heard it used seriously. I've always said and heard, cross legged. Years ago it was called Indian style but I haven't heard that in years.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, was Indian style as a kid in the early '90s. Little kids need some mnemonic device to literally just not fly off the face of the earth, and so that was the replacement they came up with. Cross-legged just doesn't grab a kid's attention like mashed apples.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

uk we say "cross legged" or "cross leggéd" if you're feeling Shakespearean

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Fun fact: in Hungarian we say "Turkish sitting" (törökülés).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

In German we call it "tailor's seat" (Schneidersitz).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Boring fact: it's also "sit like a Turk" or "sit the Turkish way" in Russian (сидеть по-турецки).

Now I'm curious what they say in Turkish.

UPD: me and @[email protected] are referring to the Lotus position which is what it is called in Turkish.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm always feeling Shakespearean

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this a quote? I don’t understand how it doesn’t rhyme.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

It does in an American accent, I guess

In my accent (UK), "cross" rhymes with "boss", and "sauce" rhymes with "horse". Pretty sure boss and horse don't rhyme.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If I'm understanding correctly then the words "sauce" and "source" are indistinguishable when spoken by a brit?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Pretty much yeah!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Source will have emphasis on the r.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its important because if youre at the dinner table and ask for sauce wrong, mum will pass you 273,000 lines of javascript.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That's borderline child abuse

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It’s the same in Aussie English

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Wait, so the non-rhotic accent adds an "r" into words that don't have one? I guess all your "r"s at the ends of words need to go somewhere...

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...which UK accent? Big place, loads of regional differences.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Why Im I being fired, Bauss? Is it because I pronounce it 'Hoss?'"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because sauce and horse are long and cross and boss are short, right?

I'm not a native speaker but our lord and savior Dr Lindsey made a great video about British English and what Americans get wrong about it.

For me as a second language learner, cross rhymes with boss but sauce neither rhymes with horse nor boss. But that's just me tho.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (29 children)

I need an example pronunciation of how it doesn't rhyme because the only way I can hear it in my head rhymes. I've never heard of this name for the seating method though.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I think that was the transitional terminology from when they used to tell kids to sit "indian style"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Ahhh yeah you can see it, there's a bit of fluff that looks like it's the right leg going over, but it's just fluff.

Owls are 90% fluff, so this checks out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We need to make them some prosthesic hands.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess I have extra big news for you: [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Always remember the acronym A.V.I.A.N.:

A - Birds
V - Are
I - Not
A - Real
N -
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is what they look like without feathers. Demon birds.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think that's a hawk.

Owls have sausage eyes, they are fixed focal length and go back into their skulls, leaving very little room for a brain.

Edit: with a reverse image search, it seems I'm not the first to say this. My guess is that this is just dodgy taxidermy - maybe it was an owl, but taxidermy is notoriously bad at eyes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I want an owl that does this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Makes it look like someone in an owl suit

load more comments
view more: next ›