this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
259 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59132 readers
3250 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good, it's going to be important for this tech to be open. Stability has been hurting for support in comparison to OpenAI, Meta, and Google. Hopefully this can really help them moving forwards.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does Stability AI open source their models?

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Investing in one company is not a bet against another company.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Especially when stability is doing something completely different from openai

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honest question. How are they completely different?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

OpenAI is known for ChatGPT, which is a text generator that works for things like writing a haiku. Though OpenAI also has a image generating AI (DALLE), it doesn't seem nearly as popular as its competitors Midjourney and SDXL. People just assume ChatGPT is OpenAI's main product, but they are actually competing on everything.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Didn't OpenAI start getting massive investments from Microsoft and then became ClosedAI?

Edit: Not that I necessarily think this will happen here. If anything, Stable Diffusion might run much better on ARC cards (or whatever their Neural Processing Unit becomes) and give a viable alternative to Nvidia

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

In the AI race, so far I'm hoping, assuming what they say about them is true, that Anthropic's Claude wins. I've read that the founders were former OpenAI employees who were concerned about macrohard funding and that AI should value safety first and foremost. That line of thinking is something you never see anymore when large companies try to financially back new tech.

Probably the biggest downside is that the article I found talking about them is that they mention getting funding from gøøgl€, which is always a little worrying.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless anti-trust law changes, Google will just buy ChatGPT and Stability to reduce competition and form a new monopoly.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

???

You know Microsoft already owns chat gpt right?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well that's just straight up not true.

OpenAI owns ChatGPT. Microsoft is a partner, but not an owner.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

49% ownership means they dictate what Open AI does. Don't kid yourself.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but to say Microsoft owns OpenAI is still disingenuous without that disclaimer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's a distinction only legally.

At 49% ownership and being 100x the value of Open AI that is effectively the same as full control. Open AI cannot blink without Microsoft getting right of first refusal.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are you being serious right now? Or am I getting wooshed?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

He's being serious: that's exactly what Bing with Chat GPT replies.

Which further illustrates why LLMs are incredibly niche tools of limited utility... As someone who uses them in their job every day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think anyone being serious brings up Bing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Hahaha fair point.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They own a minority stake in the company

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, but that minority stake is 49%

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Google will just buy 51% then, duh /s