The funniest crime he did was write bad checks to the Amish for puppies. That’s some off-the-charts levels of dirtbaggery.
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
193 points (93.7% liked)
politics
19094 readers
3702 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Honestly, the Amish run straight up puppy mills, so it's kind of what they deserved.
The Amish have this reputation for being nice people who are just a little old timey, but their insular communities hide a multitude of horrible things. Women and children are routinely abused, physically and sexually, animal abuse is rampant, it's just awful but people just see their nice furniture and barns and shit. Turns out, separating yourself from society and not having access to technology (oh, except the men who do have cell phones some of the time) is a great way do hide a lot of things and to keep members of the community from reporting it.
Two wrongs don’t make a right.
I guess, but people who run puppy mills are generally pretty awful people, so I can't feel bad about them getting screwed over for a relatively small amount of money. I had a rescue who was used as a stud in a puppy mill for his first 7 years and seeing the condition he was in when we got him and the amount of work it took to get him to feel safe, I just do not care what happens to the people who run them. They should all be shut down, have all of their animals confiscated, and have to pay every dime they've ever made off dogs to animal rescues. A bad check is like, the smallest possible amount of karma.
Sure they do
Sounds like sour grapes to me. But I'm sure the real reason he's so upset is because he got caught and has lost prime opportunities for grifting.
He's not too happy about the legal issues he's facing either.
He doesn't want to go back to dancing for dimes at the birdcage
Yes, scorched earth pls!
I bet the dnc can find some pocket change to help him out here
he's gonna spill the beans on Congressional hangovers, oh no
He's gone now, why would we still give a shit what he has to say?
The only other news I want to hear about the guy is how he's getting locked up.
Nah, I want him to share as much shit about the GOP as he can.
The only problem is that everything he says is a lie..
And even if everything he spilled was 100% true and verifiable, all it would do is make us feel righteous for always knowing those people were...well, those people. The ones that voted for them will never hear about it, and if they do, they won't really care because its not about electing someone who shares your best values but about electing someone who justifies the parts of you society abhors.
What are you talking about? He's comedy gold!
So was trump
Cry harder Santos report more people for ethics complaints
The more people like him we can get out of Congress the better
If you didn't want to stay there why did you fight so hard to do so?
Who gives a fuck what he thinks or says?
Bye Felicia!
Some shitbags need to be put in particular situations where they can be useful, if not for the right reasons, then at least due to poor motivations such that others can benefit from their actions.
The one who is already in hell is "sharpening his attacks" against the other immoral cretins in the House. Oh my they must be shaking in their boots and contrite over doing the one good thing they've ever done in their lives. At any rate, the void he left will be soon be filled with another immoral cretin just like him.
Say 'It Stinks!' George, say it.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
George Santos, the disgraced New York Republican who was expelled from the US House on Friday, spent his first hours as a former congressman railing against his former colleagues and saying he would file ethics complaints against four of them on Monday.
He wrote on X that he would file an ethics complaint against three fellow Republicans from New York – Mike Lawler, Nicole Malliotakis and Nick LaLota – who had long pushed to oust him from Congress.
He also urged a Republican in Congress to have the “testicular fortitude” to move to expel Jamaal Bowman, a New York Democrat, who pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor and paid a fine for setting off a fire alarm in a congressional office building.
His expulsion came shortly after a report from the House ethics committee detailed how he spent campaign funds on luxury goods, cosmetics and an OnlyFans subscription.
After being elected to Congress to represent Long Island and Queens last year, Santos quickly earned a reputation as a prolific liar.
Among other things, he lied about working on Wall Street, that his mother died during 9/11, and that he was a volleyball star in college.
The original article contains 375 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 48%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Have to admit “testicular fortitude” would be a great band name….
Dunno if it is evocative of actual toughness and determination though. How much fortitude can testicles have when just shifting the wrong way in bed can cause one to sack themselves and need to take a minute?
To hell with you, yourself, you shitbag.