Remember when the population of Germany was forced into a concentration camp 1/20th the size of the country while foreign ethnonationalist settler colonists claimed all of the rest?
the_dunk_tank
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
Yeah Japan and Germany didn’t become “terrorists” states after wwii because the us sunk a fuckton of money in rebuilding them, not to mention also completely controlling their political states, whereas you have Palestine which is just bombed, bombed some more, and bombed again.
I mean, you don't even need a book lmao, has this person not heard of uhhh hitler.
Seriously, Hitler was the reaction to Germany feeling victimized.
Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were not terrorist states
Eastern Europe, China, Korea, the Philippines et al. disagree.
Culturalism is a stain on society and some serious education needs to be done to rid the world of its brainworms.
Twitter OP: "There are two unique factors here: Hamas and Islam"
Samir Amin, Eurocentrism:
The (culturalist) arguments...advanced, in this respect, are confused, despite their apparent precision. They are, moreover, perfectly reversible, analogous to those previously advanced to explain the backwardness of China in terms of Confucianism, then fifty years later to explain the take-off of that country in terms of the same Confucianism! Superficial historians have explained the success of the Arab civilization of the Middle Ages by way of Islam, while contemporary journalists, even more superficially, explain the stagnation of the Arab world by the same Islam. Culturalism has no possible univocal response to any of these great historical challenges. In fact, it has too many, because it can prove any formulation and its opposite.
Liberals can't wait for a chance to minimize the evils of fascism and Nazism.
Islam and Hamas are uniquely evil. More than the Nazis. It's not leaving someone a widow(er), orphan, childless, without siblings, without cousins, homeless and destitute that makes them hate you, it's the unique evil of their religion, which is more evil and pernicious than literal WW2 era Nazism.
This whole genocide has been one giant mask off moment for Western liberalism.
What's the Red Army Faction?
Libs will just read the poppiest pop historian they can find, who will 100% confirm their opinions about how America was great and the USSR was just as bad as the Nazis.
Probably still Bevor at this point, but idk maybe someone has usurped his lib history crown.
Germany and Japan were recruiting child soldiers and suicide bombers by the end of the war. After the US forgave far more of their leaders than they should have, dumped tons of cash into rebuilding them, didn't settle their land, and stopped bombing them.
The US did build bases on some Japanese islands though and they are indeed pissed at that.
Germany and Japan were recruiting child soldiers and suicide bombers by the end of the war.
Leftist discourse around Japan is also nonsense and contradictory too.
On the one hand, they were recruiting suicide bombers, arming school children with garden tools, and their military tried to coup their own god-emperor to stop him from broadcasting his surrender. On the other hand, if the Allies had just waited (sit down, Chinese and Korean people still suffering under brutal occupation, the adults in the room are talking), the Japanese government totes would have surrendered.
No one is claiming that Japan would've "just surrendered" if the US "did nothing". The piece your missing is the USSR had finally started attacking and was sweeping the Japanese out of Manchuria. The invasion began 1945-08-09 same day as the second bomb.
Theres a leftist conspiracy theory that the Japanese high command actually surrendered because of the soviet invasion, not the atom bombs. But surrendered to the US not the USSR, since the US would probably be more favorable. The logic is the US had completely destroyed entire Japanese cities before but that never stopped them. Doing it with just one bomb was new, but thats it. Soviet invasion was basically game over. Holdings in China were doomed. And now they were looking at a joint US-USSR invasion of the home islands. Any general could see that's game over.
Alas its all a conspiracy theory. It hinges on if a bunch of japanse generals in a closed room decided to lie or not. I think one is on record as saying it was the soviet invasion but others hold to it being the atom bomb.
No one is claiming that Japan would've "just surrendered" if the US "did nothing".
I've had people tell me multiple times on Hexbear that the Japanese government were about to surrender anyway even if the A-bombs weren't dropped.
You raise a fair point about the Soviet liberation of Manchuria, but like you said we really just can't know for certain what effect either or both of those events had on the Japanese decision making process. Both were war-losing events but without transcripts or recordings we'll never know.
What really speaks to me about the military's fanatical desire to fight to the end is the fact that even after losing both Manchuria AND getting bombed, the military still launched an almost-successful coup against their own God-Emperor to keep fighting. The surrender address had to be smuggled out in dirty laundry, and it's entirely possible that Japan would have gone on fighting had that recording been prevented from leaving the Imperial Palace.
Pretty much the only reason Japan didn't carry out any retaliatory actions against the US was because we occupied the fuck out of them while also being like "Would be a shame if you didn't do exactly what we say, otherwise another atom bomb or two might get dropped around here"
More that the US more or less exonerated most of the Japanese ruling class.
Not just exonerated, but the US took active steps to ensure that the ruling class continued to have a death grip on power. Abe's grandpa was a high ranking Japanese war criminal and the rest of the Japanese political class is no less incestuous.
Bit idea: doing the “why do they hate us” circuit but it’s about Pearl Harbor and Japan
As a young lib I had no idea about the reality of Israel/Palestine until i read Palestine by Joe Sacco. Otherwise I would had just thought it was a normal thing and a proper response to the holocaust. So yes. They need to read a book.
Best use case for LLMs is to generate Harry Potter books about geopolitical issues in the hopes of maybe getting liberals to find out about things.
I found a YouTube link in your post. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: