this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
187 points (78.9% liked)

Firefox

4091 readers
62 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Why can't the devs have it update in the background or on next startup? I was in the middle of my work when I got this. Now I need to close everything and go through all the logins and 2FA again. ๐Ÿ˜ก

Chrome is much better at this, hands down. It has never interrupted me the way Firefox does during updates.

(page 2) 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm experiencing this too, but I don't have reopen any tabs. Everything comes back when restart.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes but incognito tabs are lost.

[โ€“] [email protected] -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Those are not pearls...

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I've been using Firefox on all my machines for (many) years now and literally not once have I ever seen this. Maybe you unintentionally have some option set to install updates more quickly/directly?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah, caught out the first.time. Now I never OK the update until I am about to close.down, which is a bulahit workaround but there it is. Why can't it be downloaded with a pop uo notification saying install the update now or wait until you reboot?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Can I see your update settings? Should be under FireFox Updates in General.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Well, you are right and I hate this too.

However - why can't you choose your own time to update your system with all packages? That's on Linux, and Windows has suffering embedded in its license agreement anyway, even if this bit of it isn't from MS.

Also its current UI is what I hate much more. Why could they not make it look like FF 3 at least is beyond me. It was good , usable, and it also carries an element of brand continuity, loyalty if you wish.

I understand why XUL had to go ... well, not really, they didn't have to reinvent C for multithreading, and just like that FF developers didn't have to abolish XUL in its entirety for having separate threads for separate tabs and the UI.

Actually I also hate the fact of them abolishing XUL instead of changing it into something incompatible but just as powerful.

[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago

Better safe than sorry.

[โ€“] [email protected] -5 points 10 months ago

What're you a chrome shill?

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ