this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
1296 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19094 readers
3717 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 192 points 10 months ago (19 children)

Sanders notably attributed the war in Gaza to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and “the right-wing Netanyahu government” — not to Israel in general.

This extremely obvious distinction seems to get completely lost in every discussion on the topic. I like Israel and they have the right to exist. I don't like far right conservative governments run by corrupt war criminals (but enough about Bush...).

[–] [email protected] 101 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely. Just like caring about the fate of innocent Palestinians doesn't mean rooting for the Hamas terrorists. Another distinction a lot of bad faith actors conveniently ignore in order to shift the narrative.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Absolutely.

There are essentially 4 groups that need to be discussed here. The governments of Palestine and Israel, and the civilians of Palestine and Israel.

The governments are both murderous monsters who feed off of each other to fuel their hatred and justify genocide.

The civilians are the Innocents being killed and displaced.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago

In part because there are people actively and deliberately muddying together the Netanyahu government and Israel (as well as Israel and Jews) so that any criticism of the actions of Israel or Netanyahu can be labeled "antisemitism".

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (11 children)

I mean Netanyahu has been winning elections since 1996 (granted there was a gap in the middle) so the election is getting dubious.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 145 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Has this guy ever been wrong about anything?

Best President we never had.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Pity right? Right up there with what could've been had RBG stepped down a bit earlier.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'll never forgive her for clinging on to power. She destroyed her legacy and ruined lives for the greed of it

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago (4 children)

RBG wanted Hillary to pick her replacement. The hubris of that decision. SMH

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I mean yeah he actually wasn’t quick to denounce Israel’s genocide in Gaza. I am super happy he has come around but I think I’m the beginning he was reluctant to (not because he agreed with it, because he probably didn’t want to mess with Israeli money coming after him politically).

[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I doubt he gives a good fuck about AIPAC setting their sights on him, they've been sniping for years.

I can't speak for him but my bet is that he's experienced enough to wait for the dust to settle a little before forming an opinion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago

Dude was raised in a Jewish family and volunteered with his wife in Israel in college.

Mad props for ever speaking out about Israel, IMO.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't think he's alone. The Hamas attack was a shock to many people, and Israel of course would respond but... even six weeks ago it was starting to become obvious that this was a gross overreaction.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (5 children)

He's against nuclear power, and that's the only thing I've ever disagreed with him on.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 102 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Awaiting the Christian Right to call him antisemitic.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Conservative Democrats will do it first.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Not the first time this happened.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Military industrial complex goes BRRRRRRR while the oligarchy distracts you with yet another "most important election of your life" — forcing you to choose between fascist dystopia or neoliberal dystopia instead of ... actually improving the planet and society for future generations.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 10 months ago (12 children)

ok but, trump actually directly said he plans on being a dictator... it's really the most important election in much of american history...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Just because Biden is the lesser evil (and he most certainly is. By far) doesn't mean that he should be allowed to be an evil.

He's supposed to represent the interests of every American who isn't a fascist, not a foreign government that IS fascist.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Agreed. What does that change? I’m still voting for Biden.

There aren’t any perfect choices in life, all choices of consequence have downsides. Sometimes it’s choosing harm reduction. The man has a solid record of progress with climate legislation, pardoning marijuana possession charges, limiting insulin prices and more.

Could he do better? Hell yeah. But I’m an adult in a democracy and I understand that a vote is a tool, not a moral stance. I can apply that tool in the most effective way by voting for a lesser evil.

I also have other tools at my disposal, like money. So I give my money to groups like FairVote that supports Ranked Choice Voting so that, long after the 2024 election, we can vote for candidates instead of against them.

But I’m not boycotting the system we have unless someone can convince me that Trump will see a lack of voter turnout as a lack of mandate to implement his anti-Democratic, thuggish, racist, sexist plans.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

Fossil fuel industry too, since there's a shitload of natural gas off the coast of Gaza.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yeah it's hard to disagree with this. While I don't think that the US or Canada can do much to influence the situation politically, neither should they be providing support militarily.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Bro the US used their veto in the UN to prevent the demand for a ceasefire passing. Literally only USA and Israel voted against. The US is the most powerful country in the world for now, you'd be hard pressed to find an arena of politics they DONT have immense power over. Certainly they have power over the genocides their allies do.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago (10 children)

Hmm, I feel like the US are why Israel can do as it pleases. If it weren't for the US backup the chances of a new war on Israel by several of it's neighbors backed by Iran would be very plausible. I don't wish for this to happen, it would be horrible, and I understand that the US should perhaps back Israel to a certain degree. But in return they can ask a lot from Israel, and if Israel doesn't even comply with not committing terrible war crimes, then the US could threaten them with not having their backs anymore.

What I'm trying to say is: I think you underestimate the role the US can play.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago

providing military support is influencing the situation politically

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

Stop funding terrorists, stop funding evil regimes, it's not so hard

load more comments
view more: next ›