this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
54 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3582 readers
43 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The messages also reveal a member of the group Lawyers for Israel calling Lattouf’s lawyer Josh Bornstein, who is Jewish, a “traiter”.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billytheid 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's hilariously absurd that everyone is just fine with religious extremists attacking our democratic institutions like this. How would everyone feel about Isis establishing hostile espionage cells in Australia with a view to attacking journalists. Religious people are far too dangerous to be trusted with anything remotely important.

[–] Nath 7 points 9 months ago

It’s hilariously absurd that everyone is just fine with religious extremists attacking our democratic institutions like this.

Nobody is fine with it. That's why its news.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Article is paywalled.

Are the names of these scum visible? Is there any way for us to start campaigning for them to lose their licenses to practice law?

[–] zero_gravitas 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Thanks.

Nicky Stein (Started his own firm, probably won’t fire himself but doesn’t mean his business is immune to negative public opinion)

https://www.keypropertylawyers.com.au

Robert Goot

https://www.statechambers.net/robert-m-goot-ao-sc

Debbie Wiener (Apparently has a history of being shit, ex. Going after Jewish DV victims and part of a Child Sex Abuse scandal)

http://www.mannywaks.com/blog/debbie-wiener-must-resign-from-unchain-my-heart-organisation-that-supports-agunot

https://www.vicbar.com.au/profile/6239

Lindy Blashki runs a dodgy looking “career consultation” company in Melbourne

http://www.castancareers.com/who-we-are

Anyone got a template letter for informing employers about the actions of employees outside of work and their reflection on the company?

[–] zero_gravitas 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It seems to me like the issue here isn't that these lawyers wrote letters, but whether the ABC folded to pressure instead of following their own policies, and whether information was leaked from the ABC.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I'd say there's something wrong with these workers of our legal system, clandestinely meeting together to harass workers for holding political views and terrorising public institutions to conform to their views.

[–] zero_gravitas 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They didn't "harass workers", did they? I think the ABC should also be able to withstand a letter-writing campaign and that "terrorising" is a bit of a stretch there.

Spurious threats of legal action might be of interest to professional bodies, though.

[–] wscholermann 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I'm inclined to agree. This is not front page news and arguably not even news.

Some Jewish people unhappy about an ABC reporter taking what appears to them to be an anti Israel position write a letter of complaint. The fact they are lawyers is neither here nor there.

If the situation was reversed and they were pro Palestinian complaining about what appears to be an anti Palestine point of view nobody would say boo.

[–] zero_gravitas 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The fact they are lawyers is neither here nor there.

Well, the lawyers involved think differently:

Nicky Stein

Needs to be done again today ... It is important ABC hears not just from individuals in the community but specifically lawyers so they feel there is an actual legal threat.

Nicky Stein

I have basically written to them and told them I expect a proper response, not a generic one, by COB today or I would look to engage a senior counsel. I know there is probably no actionable offence against ABC but I didn't say I would be taking one - just investigating one. I have said they they should be terminating her employment immediately.

Nicky Stein

Just got this back from Ita Buttrose in response to my email (which was a bit cheeky threatening legal action I know)

So I'd say that they're lawyers is relevant in that they thought it would help them apply pressure, and it seems to have. I don't think just anyone would be able to get a personal response from the ABC chairperson. What's more is that they knew their threats of legal action weren't well-founded.

[–] wscholermann 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Again? So what ? They are a lawyer and therefore can't write a letter of complaint? They are entitled to do so and it's not illegal to threaten potential legal action. If the court thinks it's bullshit they'll throw it out of it gets that far.

And again I make the point if it was pro Palestine lawyers complaining about a perceived anti Palestine commentary on the ABC nobody in the media would say boo.

It's a beat-up over nothing and it's not news. ABC management and their entire legal department are big boys and girls and they can handle tersely worded letters .

Now if the ABC caved to pressure and sacked the employee unfairly without due process because of these letters that would be different. But there's no evidence presented that this is happen. Until then the media can shut the fuck up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean you’d be 100% wrong. I hate what they did but the right to organise hasn’t been taken away and well it should not, otherwise you’d be a potential criminal too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I would not.

And frankly who said shit about 'the right to organise being taken away'? You're arguing against a point no one has made.

[–] zero_gravitas 2 points 9 months ago

De-paywalled archive link: https://archive.is/zm3aB