this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
542 points (97.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21178 readers
661 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    image description:
    using the famous inside you three are two wolves template.

    the headline says, "inside you there are two wolves"
    the text on top of black wolf reads, "tell her the importance of libre software, and how I use services", while on top of white wolf the text reads, "don't reveal too much information. she might be a CIA glowie"

    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] [email protected] 58 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    "I'd like to talk to you about some cool software, but would you mind taking these illegal drugs with me first? You know, the whole fed thing."

    [–] [email protected] 50 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    IIRC undercovers have, in the past, taken drugs to 'fit in' and keep their cover. The guidance to undercovers is probably 'try to avoid it' but the directive of 'don't get caught' and 'try not to die' probably override that.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

    Them: "That's a myth, actually, they can totally do drugs undercover."

    Me: "Do you want some free acid the CIA made or not?"

    [–] [email protected] 34 points 9 months ago (5 children)
    [–] [email protected] 48 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    CIA agents glow in the dark.

    [–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    Do you have to crack them in half and shake them a bit first before they start glowing?

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    No, they do that by themselves

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

    it can't hurt tho... well not you anyway

    [–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    You can see them when you're driving.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    Actual video of CIA agents experiencing low-light photonic emissions in the visual spectrum.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

    Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

    video

    Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

    I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

    It's even worse when you shine a black light on them

    [–] [email protected] 37 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Wikipedia sez

    The term was coined by computer programmer Terry A. Davis, who allegedly believed that the CIA was stalking and harassing him. "Glowie" is often used in online forums to refer to government agents, especially undercover operatives who infiltrate online far-right spaces.

    "Glow in the dark" and its derivative terms have been used to refer to various groups: newcomers that do not fit in with the culture of certain forums and are thus suspected to have bad intentions, journalists who report on extremist groups, tech companies that collect users' personal data, and others.

    [–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

    Rest in peace Terry, you crazy diamond!

    [–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Thank you for actually answering my question 🙂

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Ayy one of todays lucky ten thousand ^^ although thats more intended for very common knowledge i guess. https://xkcd.com/1053/

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

    I had to look it up, so I thought I'd share the wealth.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    Did Terry Davis really coin it? I'm too lazy to fact check right now, but I wonder what the story is there.

    Afaik from my time on 4chan, the phrase came from undercover FBI agents on the platform being so obvious they "glow".

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

    There's a bunch of citations on Wikipedia, maybe there's an explanation in there?

    [–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

    Thank you, very cool!

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

    This comment glows

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

    Etymology
    From glow +‎ -ie. Originated by Terry Davis, who stated in a 2017 video that "CIA n####rs glow in the dark", implying that they are conspicuous. The term "glowie" would become popular on the 4chan /pol/ board around 2019.

    at this point it's basically a racist dog whistle....

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    it's not a 'racist dog whistle' now, or at least that wasn't my intention. it's another word for three-letter agencies or sometimes even bigtech.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

    just because it's not your intention doesn't change where it comes from and with whom it's typically popular...

    [–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    My eyes sheds a little tear seeing Terryisms live on in the lingos of the tech savvies.

    [–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

    Inside of you there are two wolves.

    But the total recommended number of wolves inside a human body is zero. And they shouldn't be able to talk.

    Go see a doctor.

    [–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

    Thanks for the alt text. You don't have to write complete sentences, for example "white wolf:" is enough.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

    thank you for the suggestion.

    [–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago

    You have reached transcendence when you realize it's a honey pot and you go anyway.

    [–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago

    She's def a glowie

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    If your threat model involves evaluating whether someone is a glowie, ask your mental health care professional about symptoms of paranoia/schizophrenia.

    Unless distrusting strangers is the only reason you’re not in jail for violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. In that case, how’s your connection speed to Lemmy via TOR (I’m actually curious!)?

    …I think you’d want to use TOR for everything if you were actually deep into black hat stuff, or is that overkill?

    Another question, how many of us have actually interacted with the CIA? Aren’t they going after like super naughty people? And Aaron Swartz, motherfucking murderers. (different feds though) RIP

    Signed,

    Glowie throwing you off the scent

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    TOR has a bunch of backdoors for three letter agencies. You're better off not connecting to the Internet if that's the threat model, and people do have to live with such threats in some parts of the world.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    The devs promise no backdoorsies!

    A reddit thread claims it’s open source & used by the government. I would definitely agree hardcore criminals shouldn’t touch some modern technology, but how’d you ascertain it’s backdoored?

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    It's used by the government because the keys to the backdoors rest with the NSA. I don't have the source for what I read right now, but TOR devs are known to work with the government. I believe a similar interaction exists between I2P devs and the government but perhaps not to the extent that TOR does. Note that the government has a vested interest in having backdoors to TOR since it is used more by cybercriminals (for what reasons I do not understand since they know just as well that TOR cannot be trusted).

    Read recent research publications about the vulnerabilities of TOR and I2P and you'll quickly realise how trivial it would be for the government. As with semi-decentralised designs, there are many ways to break such architectures and the government holds such capabilities.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

    I don’t have the source for what I read right now, but TOR devs are known to work with the government.

    bro it was developed by them, for secure communication lmao.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(network)

    The core principle of Tor, onion routing, was developed in the mid-1990s by United States Naval Research Laboratory employees, mathematician Paul Syverson, and computer scientists Michael G. Reed and David Goldschlag, to protect American intelligence communications online

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

    It was handed over to the foundation as an independent organisation. However, that doesn't mean that they don't have their stinky hands in the project, it's just that it's not public.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    Just what services do you use that are of interest to three letter agencies? They really aren't interested in tracking down furry-porn browsing habits through TOR and I2P

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

    So every corporation on the planet is full of suspects for the crime of employing system admins then. Well, good luck to them

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

    For me it's more like:

    • Tell other people about all these cool FOSS so people can enjoy them and ditch Big Tech stuff
    • Don't tell other people about all these cool FOSS because they might get too popular and Big Tech might notice and do whatever they can to remove competition by any means necessary.
    [–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

    The wolves inside of me are now kissing 😳

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    Which one is going to win?

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    the black one seems to be winning as I don't want another one falling victim to proprietary disservices.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

    I read your meme and comment in Dale Gribbles voice.