this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
213 points (96.5% liked)

News

23305 readers
4706 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A council has apologised after parents were offered a choice of class photos with or without children with complex needs in them.

Parents at Aboyne Primary complained after being sent a link from a photography company offering them alternative pictures.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Scotland??
I was 90% sure this was Texas or Florida.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago

Texas or Florida

Who would want a photo of an empty classroom though?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nah, in Texas and Florida, they just keep kids with 'complex needs' all together in a classroom at the end of the hall, so they don't have to do anything fancy for the classroom photo.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Ohio too, it's every student with an IEP (which the school will ignore) in there.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

I guess check your bias? Assholes are all over

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The school was unaware that the company did this.

In Texas or Florida, it would have been the school (board) organizing the alternate shoot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

That seems unlikely, even if it's what they claim. You would need the staff to help organize the separate photos.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Scotland? Was the second picture empty?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah, the second photo offered to parents was the article thumbnail.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 7 months ago (4 children)

The fuck is wrong with people? Are we not all imperfect flesh? I hope all their bones escape.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago

I hope all their bones escape.

LOL, now that's a curse I'm going to have to file away to use myself later!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

From this rotting cage of biomatter

Machine God, set us free!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

If the flesh came into being because of spirit, that is a marvel, but if spirit came into being because of the body, that is a marvel of marvels.

Yet I marvel at how this great wealth has come to dwell in this poverty.

This was from a 'heretical' sect of early Christianity who not only seemed to have incorporated Lucretius's proto-evolutionary thinking and atomism, but ended up claiming we were actually in a copy of an original reality fashioned by an intelligence the original humanity brought forth, and that it's actually the future but we just don't realize it.

So maybe a Machine God already did set you free from your embodied shackles, you just aren't aware because the virtual embodiment is so accurately simulated it never really entered your mind that it's already a digital copy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

…where are the bones going to?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why would you wish that on the bones.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

They know what they did..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Local dog shelters?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Well now I know what I'm dreaming about tonight

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago

I remember when retarded was the PC term. Now we just call them republicans.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I was watching some TV show, maybe CSI SVU or maybe some English crime procedural, where the parents were brought in to talk about their son physically abusing a special needs person. It turned out the parents photoshopped out the special needs person from the class photo, and that was used as evidence that they encouraged his discriminatory behavior. I was thinking while watching the show that those are some real fucking assholes for photoshopping out someone from a school photo before they would display it in their home.

Turns out it was something real people do.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago

You know the only reason the company offered this option was because they had been asked by other parties.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Btw, who displays class photos at home?

Why would you want a bunch of random kids on your wall?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

With a couple I know, they had the class photo of one of their sons at the fridge one year. Seemed weird to me too, so I asked. Turns out the son had wanted to hang it because he had always had trouble with fitting in in previous schools, and this was the first time he really was friends with those kids and invited them over as well.

That seemed like a good reason to me personally.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

That's wholesome

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (22 children)

Fucking PC language making articles indecipherable. "Complex needs", wtf does that actually mean? How many fell into this category? Were different pictures taken, or was one edited after the fact? Why are they afraid to add context?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Disabled kids?

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago (3 children)

How did they get two different versions? Did they take two sets of photos or edit out some of the children? I hope somebody gets fired.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I kinda hope they used that guy on whatever, that always does a "terrible" job editing people's photos.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Vague, smudged empty spots where you'd expect a kid.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

So, Kate Middleton did the edits

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Do we have a community for malicious compliance or bad photoshops or any of that ilk? I’m trash at finding these.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Obviously they took two photos and let the parents choose to buy option A or option B.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

So they took a photo with all the kids and then asked the undesirables to leave for the second photo? And everyone was fine with that?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Well, from the article:

It is understand some class photographs were taken before the pupils with additional support needs were brought in.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Clearly, not everyone is fine with that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

My guess is they took a picture with the smaller group first and then brought in the second group to take the full picture.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It is understand some class photographs were taken before the pupils with additional support needs were brought in.

How did that happen, when no one in the school was in with it? Where were the kids with complex needs at that time? As a parent I would have a closer look at the school, no matter what they say now. I mean it takes time to get the kids stand together, stop making funny faces etc. This was not done in five minutes or the pictures would be awful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I'd imagine (from personal experience): the period before was split, with one part of the class doing something and the others doing something else. Therefore they didnt arrive at the photoshoot together.

load more comments
view more: next ›