this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
43 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30527 readers
124 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think this video showcases an interesting aspect of gaming that I never really thought about before. In their case, they play more games for a shorter amount of time vs spending a large portion of their time in few games.

Personally I'm on the side of spending more of my time in a select number of games. By far I have put no less then 3000-4000 hours in Minecraft. Logged by Steam, I got 1300+ hours in both GTA V and American Truck Simulator

More recently I've been really into Rocket League and Trackmania. These games are notable because I am constantly working to improve and get better at the game. As much replay-ability as much I find enjoyment in succeeding.

From time to time though, I do really enjoy getting into shorter, more story based games. Great examples being Portal 2, Road96, and Firewatch. What kind of gamer are you?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Depends on your stage of life as well. I'm 41 now and a dad, so I have max 2 hours per day. When I was still studying I played wow for entire days.

Now I enjoy shorter games like Firewatch and Lake. Just finished Beacon Pine. Xbox Gamepass is excellent for this as it's full of these games.

I did play longer games like Mass effect legendary edition, and The Witcher 3, but I only play such long games if I really like them.

Thousands of hours in a game is unfortunately out of the question.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm 50+ and while my kids are old though to manage without me, I still have plenty of other responsibilities.
I don't really "track" my gaming and I think the focus on hours spent is a bit silly.

I play when I have time to relax.
It's mostly WoW, single-player RPGs, Paradox Grand Strategy games, online chess etc - stuff that doesn't need twichy eye-hand coordination, too old and slow for that - games like that make me frustrated, because I used to be competitive in Quake back in the day. Just can't keep up with the kids :)

Mechabellum has been my latest addiction

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'm your age and I'm in a similar situation. I still play longer RPGs when I really like them but it's definitely harder to do. My last forever game was warframe. I clocked in about 3300 hours.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Generally I'm a boomer shooter kinda guy, but I have recently been into more "chill in the world and 'work' on stuff" games like Satisfactory, Stardew Valley, Slime Rancher, Minecraft, etc

But like you I also occasionally pick up a shorter, story driven game. Fire watch is one of the best games I have ever played.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Most story games I play once, however long they take. Only a few get the "privilege" of a re-play.

Multiplayer games or games that don't really have an ending I might put in more, like 200h in PUBG, 420h in Satisfactory (so far), 400h+ in Monster Hunter World, different roguelikes with 100h+, etc.

On Steam, the two games I've put in more time than almost all others are Nioh 1 and 2, with a combined 1200h. That's not even multiple characters.

Only looking at Steam, it's probably pretty even between story games and these "forever games."

Then there are Blizzard games, which I've played more than basically anything else. I have probably over 25k hours in WoW, thousands in Diablo 2 and 3, hundreds in Heroes of the Storm and Overwatch. Their games pretty much always do it for me, which is a shame, since it was revealed how much of a shitshow the company is, so I currently don't play their games.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are 5 games on my Steam list over 100 hours, maxing out ~300 hours: Stardew Valley, Skyrim, No Mans Sky, Don’t Starve, Cyberpunk 2077

If we include Nintendo games it probably goes up to 8: BotW, TotK, Animal Crossing New Horizons.

So at the most, I’ll spend a couple months on a game before moving on - most other games I play are either quick weekend completions, or maybe take a couple of weeks to finish. Usually when I start putting months into a game I begin to seriously question whether I’m making the best use of my time and the “what am I doing with my life” itch makes me quit games for a bit. 😅

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

2 or 2000 with very little inbetween.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Racing games and multiplayer I can put hundreds of hours into, but it feels like single player games are too long these days. I prefer 20-30 hours for the main story although I do enjoy playing 60+ hour jrpgs occasionally.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel like it's the opposite. It's rare to find single player games longer than 20h.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AC Odyssey took me like 80+ hours, Valhalla apparently takes even longer. I feel like open world SP games take longer (and usually overstay their welcome)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Breath of the Wild can be done in under 30 minutes or take hundreds of hours. I'm about 120 hours in and have yet to finish. I could do the final battle now but there's way more going on in this stunning world for me to enjoy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've been playing Runescape since grade school. I'm approaching a bit shy of 25,000 hours played (a little under 3 years). As an AFK'able "second monitor game" a good half of that is just "I'm at my computer anyway" but the other half is actual investment/more active playing.

I don't bother playing a game if I'm not going to invest a significant amount of time into it. I aim for 100% completion or reaching the top 0.1% of players if there is a competitive ranking system. It's extremely rare for me to play a game that I don't dump a minimum of 500 hours into.

My play time is less now than it was when I was a teen but it's still skewed towards the higher end due to me being fortunate enough to work from home with a FIFO queue of work. If my work is done - I can game during work hours if I want to. As long as I keep close tabs on my queue and handle anything as it comes in. This gives me 8~ hours of potential game time that I otherwise wouldn't have. Since I need to be near my computer in case any work comes in - I'm pretty limited with activities I can do. I can lift some weights, browse the internet, cook a quick meal, or play video games. But I can't really leave the house, go swim in the pool, etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

RuneScape is a great second monitor game, the game allows you to be very active when you want to and have time for that, chill semi-afk content when you also want to watch videos' on the side, and even 'click once every five minute' style gameplay. I have a bit over 9000 hours on my ironman.

After Runescape, my second most played game is definitely Minecraft, then Skyrim with about 550 hours, Fallout 4 with 300 hours and everything else is 115 hours or less.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Judging from my Elder Scrolls Online experience, it takes me about 175-200 days played to burn out on something I'm really into. But nothing else has really come close to that since I quit about a year ago. I've been kind of bouncing from game to game, got a couple hundred hours into Guild Wars 2, a hundred hours or so each on Grim Dawn and Diablo 3, a little less than a hundred on Vermintide 2. Basically, when I find a game that scratches an itch, I will play it until I've squeezed every drop of content from the bottle. And it looks like I'll give a new game about a hundred hours to hook me, if I can get past the first hour or so.

I kind of want to go back to ESO, but it's 75% less fun for me without the subscription (the Craft Bag is BAE, and the DLCs are where I'd be spending my time), but I'm hesitating on the question of "Is it responsible of me to be spending $15/mo on a game I've already quit playing once?" And yet, nothing else has come close to hitting that mark for me. GW2 is really amazing, it's got a lot of things I'd definitely miss if I went back to ESO, but... it's not the same, somehow.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Definitely more time in less games. It makes me seem like I don't like them but I get burned out yknow

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The hours I dump into games varies wildly. Certain games, mainly Splatoon 2/3, Final Fantasy 14, Factorio, Satisfactory, and anything with a level editor I'll happily dump hundreds of hours into. According to Steam, the game I dumped the most hours into as of this post is Distance, with the majority of that being spent in its level editor.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It varies wildly. I've got about 2000 into Path of Exile, a couple hundred into fallout 4, 100 or so into each Souls game, but I had literal years of play time put into WoW before I quit playing in Wrath.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When did people start tracking how many hours they play? I used to play games for hours a day. I loved getting lost in them, but I never kept track of hour many hours I spent. Now I'm a dad with a full time job, so I only get to play a little bit every once in a while. But when i get an hour to play I really enjoy it a lot!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only reason I know how many hours I have is because steam & other stores track how many hours you have in games. Minecraft is one game that doesn't global counter, however & I agree its nice to just get lost and enjoy playing with friends.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

some games also track it in game, like in Elden Ring loading a character you will time spent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I tend to prefer indie games, cult classic series like armored core, and a few big mainstream titles like Mario kart and breath of the wild. How much time I put into games depends not on what "kind" of gamer I am so much as whether I need more out of it. I've only played Undertale twice through, but it had a big impact on me and at the end I had enough to take with me. If I feel like I've lost those impressions I might go back to that well after a long while. Right now I'm going back to a few of my old PS2 games to see if there's more for me to draw from them. They're like old books you reread with new eyes.

On the other hand I've put hundreds of hours into darkest dungeon and slay the spire, and I'll probably continue until I've gotten to a point where I feel like I've overcome my limitations in a meaningful way. Those games are about dynamic challenges and perseverance at any cost, which resonates with me on a deeper level.

Games are art, or should try to be, and how long you spend with them depends on your relationship with them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The most hours I've ever put into a game (that wasn't WoW pre-Cata) is 99 (Persona 5). My brain just can't (or won't) comprehend playing something for x-hundred/thousand hours even if I really enjoy it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Same here, with the only exception of games I keep getting back to (basically my all-time favorites that I replay every few years) and games I drop and then decide to restart (and then drop, and restart, and drop, and restart).

Recently I've been avoiding games that are more than 20-40 hours (doing main+some side quests) because I came to the conclusion that there's no game longer than that that doesn't have a bloated-to-deatb story or gameplay mechanics that feel more like a treadmill than a game.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

As far as single-player games are concerned, I realized I have a sweet-spot of ~100 hours when I get somewhat tired of it, and ~150 hours when I'm just done. I don't know anything about the story of Xenoblade 3 after the snow area because I crossed that threshold and just stopped paying attention. I just wanted it to be over. I had just played the Live A Live remake before that and I realized how much I miss the pacing of classic RPGs.

On the other hand, I'm closing in on 500 hours in Monster Hunter Rise. I have no problem casually grinding out games that aren't a long-term story-commitment.

[–] Mekboy_nutkrakka 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Depends some games like Miitopia, Mario Kart 8D, Monster Sanctuary or modding Dawn of War Dark Crusade I've play a lot of hours cause of giving me tools for me to be creative or easily distract myself when my mind is fried, replayabily while being able to play differently or just being able to mod and rebalance the game.

Some of my favourite games are short like Wandersong and the Steamworld Games

Some of the games i play a long time also give me idea of games i'll never make

Some games i know i could of played a lot of hours i don't cause of isolation and that online doesn't fill the hole of local play so now i don't play online games even if i'm interested in them or like playing them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I’ve got 2000 hours in Warframe spread across nearly a decade, most other games that I like clock in at about 100-200 hours, with most story focused games getting about 8-12. It really depends on routine updates and replayability

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

However many it takes to beat them. I typically don't replay games, and I don't play into those insane multiplayer games that require hundreds if not thousands of hours. I beat one, I move on. The only exceptions are NHL and MLB, I play those on Friday nights with some beers to decompress from the week so I have a disproportionate amount of hours in those, but I also don't buy new ones every year; maybe every 4-5 years. I really bounce off of games that are too long or too big, though. No game needs to be 100 hours long. The last time I did one of those was Assassin's Creed Odyssey and that's the last time I'll ever do that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I generally prefer games that are more open ended and that let me hang out in the world working on something. Games like Skyrim, Satisfactory, Reshaping Mars, ETS2 and ATS, for example. I will play longer games that are more on rails, like Rise of the Tomb Raider or Horizon Zero Dawn, but I'll tire of them much quicker than others. Something about being forced to move on to the next thing too many times makes me nope out of it after a while. The other games I mentioned have progression and goals, but there isn't really an off-switch and you're not really pushed to complete them. A game on rails will end, and I get my enjoyment from being part of the world, really.

Other times, I like playing games where you can do a quick mission or something and call it a day. I'll think I have a lot of hours in them, but I'll usually be shocked by how few it really is. I've played what seems like a lot of Phasmophobia, just doing one or two solo runs and calling it good for a few days or a month or whatever. I have maybe 40 hours in that game. Another example is Deep Rock Galactic. I like them and will come back to them, but I normally only play them when I have an hour or two at most to put into them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like a variety of experiences so 20 hours seems about the sweet spot for me per game. Except for multiplayer games, which I can play on and off for years. I'm sure I've accumulated a combined couple thousand hours out of Counterstrike, TF2, and Halo over the years for instance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

What I enjoy about CS is everyone starts back from the same level on each map in terms of loadout and budget. Yet every game is different in one way or another, with different people in matchmaking or even different macro or micro decisions by familiar players. So even playing the same 5 maps means they are different each time you play. It's why I've been playing CS since 1.0 and have logged just shy of 2000 hrs in CSGO. I can't remember how many hours I have played of CS in the pre-Steam era but it used to be 4-5 hour stints I reckon. Now I play 1-3 hours or so max, and that only 1 or 2 times a week.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I found I put around 200 hours in fallout, cyberpunk, Witcher, and horizon zero. And I thought that was WAY too much for me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I definitely play more shorter games. I tried playing spme longer ones but since the breaks can be months long it would take me hours to re-learn the interface!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

100hrs max for RPG style games, typically 20-30hrs I would say

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'm a big fan of replayable games, esp things like Roguelikes. I usually have one "main" game at a time, and sink in about 100 hours or so until I feel like I've got the "meat" all eaten and transition to something new. Multiplayer games also serve a great role for me since they are naturally varied, and I'll easily put 200-300 hours in my initial kick, and occasionally come back for shorter stints over time.

Occasionally, a game really grips me. I've got ~700 hours in RimWorld, I was depressed and unemployed and it kept me going. I've also got about that much in Binding of Isaac, IMO still the greatest Roguelike made and has metric tons of content. I also have like 800 in Stellaris, but that's because I used to play it full time during my WFH call center job, I never play it on my own time haha

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

My girlfriend hates video games other than Stardew Valley. She freaked out when she realized she put 100 hours into Stardew. Sweet summer child.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

All over the map here. As of late I tend to be more focused and am putting in many hours to fewer games. If you look at my trophy list or anything else that keeps track, I have an extensive list of games I have only played a few hours of.

Honestly, neither makes you a “gamer.” Enjoying gaming is what makes you a gamer. Doesn’t matter if that is one game or a hundred games.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Looking at Steam, I've got 800 hours in Stellaris, 500 in Factorio, 300 in Deep Rock Galactic, and down rapidly from there. Those are outliers, I buy a lot of single player indie games in the 10 to 20 hour range. Some less than that! I think I prefer shorter games, so I can actually finish them, and try a wider variety.

Then again, I have an unknown number of hours in Doom and Doom 2, since I don't play it on steam and have been playing it since 1995. But, I haven't replayed the base games in years; people continue to make new maps for it, after all this time.

[–] briongloid 2 points 1 year ago

The best games like Hades and Elden Ring I get to around 100hrs, with multiplayer games like DbD & R6 I get to about 500-1000.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It varies hugely. Rocket League is my most played on Steam and I think I'm at around 1700 hours, but that's the kind of game I've played on and off for years. The other worst was Foxhole which I managed to rack up 600 hours in over a couple of months. Usually for a game I like it'll be 100-200 hours, but it does vary hugely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I normally play single player games. I prefer story focused games and games like factorio, banished. Typically I spend 50h per game if I enjoy it.

For my favourites I have spent close to 400h on the Witcher 3, 200h on cyberpunk 2077, probably just as much on Skyrim and dishonered and Satisfactory.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I prefer a nice contained 25-30 hour game most of the time.

That doesn’t stop me from having 700 hours in Total War: Warhammer II. But it takes a really special game to grab me for more than 60 or so hours.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It depends really, for MP games I usually put in 300 hours or so, Ultra Street Fighter 4 and Monster Hunter World I have 300 hours, but I have like 692 hours on a more replayable game like Skyrim if you combine the playtime I have on the normal and Special edition.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Most games I play are single-player. And even then, I hardly play videogames anymore these days. I'd probably average about 8-10 hours on a game over the course of a few years, with some outliers like Killing Floor 2 and Dawn of War (this is by far the most time I've ever spent playing a game, without 300ish hours across the expansions and mods).

I just generally don't have the time or energy to invest in playing something. Maybe I'll play for about 30 minutes before I have the sinking feeling of needing to be more productive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

My longest played game with just slightly over 500 hours is Arma 2 with 577 hours. 100% of that time went into the DayZ mod.

But those games are the exception, most games I play are story based so I have hundreds of games with just 5-30 hours that I finished and moved on.

Like even the games that I really enjoy like Portal 2 I only have 150 hours in, after playing hundreds of community test chambers. (Really recommended by the way, there are some excellent chambers in the workshop)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It really depends on the game and what phase I'm at currently. The games that I can dump hours upon hours on are usually RPGs or have some kind of RPG element to them. I used to spend an insane amount of time on competitive games, but I've grown to avoid them because of how toxic they get eventually, though I still have an itch for them now and then.

Adulthood really decreased my playing time, more than I expected. It's also harder for me to play for long periods without feeling unproductive and questioning what is the point of this..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It really depends on the game, games like pokemon, ck3, ffxiv, wow, minecraft, and the elder scrolls, stardew valley, animal crossig etc I put a few hundred to 1000 hours in and I play them on and off throughout the year. Other games I play once and then maybe again in a few years if I liked it. It really depends. games I play for a long time need to be games I don't feel bad for NOT playing for a long time.

But I am someone who always kinda has her own little story about the character I am playing while I play, so it's always something new when I decide to make another playthrough. And which is why CK3 is the most dangerous timesink for me because you don't just play one character

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've got a few games I sink tons and tons of hours into, mainly Skullgirls, Them's Fightin' Herds, Splatoon 3, and Slay the Spire. I'd like to make more time to finish story-driven stuff though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I've played the crap out of slay the spire. One of my all time favourite games. But I really struggle to convince anyone of why it's great...

Just bought it on my mobile, and now have the fun of completing it again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I go in cycles. Most of the time I prefer highly replayable games that I can sink my teeth into over a long period. Deep Rock Galactic, Monster Hunter, Grim Dawn, etc. Then I'll dip into some shorter experiences for a little while. I have a hard time sticking those games out until the end most of the time. I guess I just dont like endings. It's not a problem I have with any other media, though. Quite the opposite, in fact.

load more comments
view more: next ›