this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
108 points (87.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32375 readers
543 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

Initial commit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I have on multiple occasions done a much more verbose variant of that: "I genuinely cannot remember what I changed"

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

"Improve performance by removing a function that never did anything" the story of my life

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"Eigentlich fertig" was for an IP subnet calculator that I programmed with a fellow student

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Und uneigentlich? :D

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

"If you are reading this, you are in the wrong branch."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

"idk what happened but it works fine now"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

“i cant believe this works i think”

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Forgot to commit changes lol"

I also apparently forgot append was a thing

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

"Updated README"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I'm ashamed... It's simply "bump deps"

Did I also touch some code and tests connected to dependency updates. Yes.

Did I document any of that? No.

Did I spend more time writing this comment the thinking about the commit. Most definitely.

Will I be bisecting to this commit after our next deploy and cursing at myself? Probably.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Added missing lifecycle blocks"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

this is terrible, will rewrite later

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

How am I supposed to do that I'm waiting for docker to rebuild my image to know if my new configuration fucks everything

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

"push files"

(It's a personal repo for homework assignments)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"fixed. whoops..."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

"Move from GitHub to Forgejo"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

"can still be better but priority changed"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

"relearning c++ arrays again"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

merge staging

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

"formatting and typo"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

"fix previous commit"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

"TLDR..."

I'm kidding, my applications are so simple version control would be synonymous with entire rewrites as I lean new things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

"Did stuff"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Fixes issues in PR

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

"Added brew to list of accepted package managers"

From my "install all the things" script I host on github

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

"feat: replace every function in FunctionIdentifier with a single closure

My goal with less-function-id was to create a more neat solution but instead it turned into something far more ugly and limiting" You sometimes think a solutioniis good and neat until you implement it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

“Expanded unit test to cover new functionality” true story

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Refactor package structure

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

e12fa3b (HEAD -> main, origin/main) No

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

(translated from German) I can't write

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

chore: update image tag

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

"Default rating"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

PAPYRUSSSSSS!!!!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

"src/utils/typing: added tests for isArray"

we have 90% coverage minimum

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It was for work so I can't check right now (Gitlab which is only accessible on LAN), but it was something like "updated README.MD"