"various changes"
Programmer Humor
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
Initial commit
I have on multiple occasions done a much more verbose variant of that: "I genuinely cannot remember what I changed"
Fix tpyo
"Improve performance by removing a function that never did anything" the story of my life
"Eigentlich fertig" was for an IP subnet calculator that I programmed with a fellow student
Und uneigentlich? :D
"If you are reading this, you are in the wrong branch."
"idk what happened but it works fine now"
“i cant believe this works i think”
"Forgot to commit changes lol"
I also apparently forgot append was a thing
"fixed"
"Updated README"
I'm ashamed... It's simply "bump deps"
Did I also touch some code and tests connected to dependency updates. Yes.
Did I document any of that? No.
Did I spend more time writing this comment the thinking about the commit. Most definitely.
Will I be bisecting to this commit after our next deploy and cursing at myself? Probably.
"Added missing lifecycle blocks"
this is terrible, will rewrite later
How am I supposed to do that I'm waiting for docker to rebuild my image to know if my new configuration fucks everything
- fixes #22
" "
see #234
wip
"push files"
(It's a personal repo for homework assignments)
"fixed. whoops..."
"Move from GitHub to Forgejo"
"can still be better but priority changed"
Changes
"relearning c++ arrays again"
merge staging
Notes
"formatting and typo"
"fix previous commit"
"TLDR..."
I'm kidding, my applications are so simple version control would be synonymous with entire rewrites as I lean new things.
...
"Did stuff"
Fixes issues in PR
"Added brew to list of accepted package managers"
From my "install all the things" script I host on github
"feat: replace every function in FunctionIdentifier with a single closure
My goal with less-function-id was to create a more neat solution but instead it turned into something far more ugly and limiting" You sometimes think a solutioniis good and neat until you implement it
scoping
“Expanded unit test to cover new functionality” true story
Refactor package structure
e12fa3b (HEAD -> main, origin/main) No
(translated from German) I can't write
chore: update image tag
"Default rating"
PAPYRUSSSSSS!!!!
"src/utils/typing: added tests for isArray"
we have 90% coverage minimum
It was for work so I can't check right now (Gitlab which is only accessible on LAN), but it was something like "updated README.MD"