The tribe says AirBnB bad
the "tribe" here is literally everyone except for the people who parasite on it.
The tribe says AirBnB bad
the "tribe" here is literally everyone except for the people who parasite on it.
Housing prices are based on comparable homes sold in the area, so what are you guys talking about?
we are talking about the fact that if you have trouble selling the house, then it is literally the market, who told you that your "market" valuation is clearly wrong.
You’re implying that any home on the market is priced too high simply because it’s on the market.
of course i am not. you should have learned what hyperbole is sometime in elementary school.
the statement is not valid for every house that is on the market for 5 minutes. it is however perfectly valid for most of what is on the market longer than w/e is the average for that market. maybe you have something truly unique and you have to wait for your customer, or maybe you have inflated sense of the value of the object you are trying to sell, be it a house or used car.
Nothing is /wrong/
a lot is wrong. illegal hotel chain is a shady way to privatize profits and externalize the negative effects of running a hotel.
remember, the houses you see on the market are those which did not get sold.
I stayed at an Airbnb
Nothing funnier than source of the problem complaining about the problem :D
i see lot of problems, but "paying for news when it is on your side" is definitely not a solution. that just means you end up in some echo chamber like fox news audience.
this my reply to another comment covers the rest, so i am not going to copy and paste it - https://lemm.ee/post/45874842/15772730
Except news outlets get so caught up in being “neutral” and “fair” that they won’t accurately report on things when shit gets really fucking bad like now.
as the aphorism says, neutrality is not "five minutes for hitler and five minutes for jew". if a fact is that the candidate for president is scum, that should be indeed reported. the problem in today's journalism is the pseudo-neutrality, which in fact thwarts efforts for good reporting.
so i agree with you, but i still stand behind the fact that news should not take side. they should report facts and the problem is they are sometimes not doing that in the name of said pseudo-neutrality.
News are not supposed to take sides, they should present facts regardless of who (dis)likes them
fundamentally disbelieves in a system with exactly two discrete options
except the polls are exactly about two discrete options. "not believing" in it is like not believing in gravity. it doesn't make you philosopher, it makes you dumb moron.
I am big fan of voyager and janeway's character, but dear lord, is that statue hideous. (I would still visit given the chance).
You could have seeded nonsense into Google any time in the past nearly 3 decades
We could have, hence why we did.
Short trip to Alabama might help to expand your horizons...