DarthJon

joined 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] -3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No. The inability to accept that genocidal Islamist terrorists are bad guys shows just how morally confused the left is.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's rare, but every now and then I find a voice of reason on this website. Thank you.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 15 hours ago

In one single sentence you summed up everything wrong with the left and their perspective on Israel (not to mention the entire world).

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago

Literally don't care what she says.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago

This has nothing to do with anyone's sex life. It's about children making life-altering medical decisions they may come to regret later. Raising that as a legitimate concern is not "transphobic." And considering the growing numbers of people who do have serious regrets and even go through de-transitioning, I would say it's a legitimate concern.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (21 children)

Don't lose sight of who the bad guys are here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I see, so you think Israel is telling civilians to move just so they *look *merciful. Because it just can't be possible that Israeli leaders are human beings with consciences and actually want to prevent civilian death if they can. Is that the implication?

Yes, of course my plan rests on a lot of assumptions. The settlements are the most complex part of negotiating peace between the two sides. But agreements have been reached in principle in the past (like Camp David and Taba). It's difficult but not impossible, provided both sides are willing to figure it out. I probably should have included in my plan that the Netanyahu government eventually has to be replaced by a more moderate administration.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The only system compatible with full liberty is anarchy. But you stated that economic democracy is libertarian, and then proceeded to call for it to be mandated. Mandates are authoritarian, not libertarian.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Mandating it doesn't seem to be consistent with individual liberty, though.

Forgive me for being pragmatic about this, but if this was such a good idea and consistent with the interests of the people, you wouldn't have to mandate it. This is how things would be done.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I understand that employee-owned companies exist (though I think it's rather telling that I haven't heard of any of them) but I thought this was a model for economic policy at the societal level. Those companies all exist within a capitalist economy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Does it really feel like that's where the region is headed? Is that why Israel keeps telling Gazans and Lebanese people to move out of target areas? Don't you think Israel could eliminate all 2 million Gazans in a few hours if they wanted to? Step back from the propaganda and think critically for a minute.

If you think there are a lot of Palestinians who want revenge, that's all the more reason to postpone the recognition of a Palestinian state. Part of the problem with the two state solution is that it rests on a faulty assumption: that statehood is a goal of the Palestinian people. The past 75 years of history shows that to be false. If they wanted a state, they would have one. The goal of the Palestinian people (or to be fair, the Palestinian leadership) has always been the destruction of Israel. That's what has always defined Palestinian nationalism. So pushing the 2SS is pushing a solution on the Israelis and Palestinians that the latter never wanted, and now the former don't really want either.

The only real solution is one that will take time and involves several important developments:

  1. Israel eliminates the immediate genocidal Islamist threats. That includes not only Hamas and Hezbollah, but preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
  2. Israel will have to retain some level of security control over Gaza while rebuilding plans are developed. An interim government will have to step in to govern Gaza, which will likely be a coalition of the PA and moderate Arab countries (like UAE, SA, etc).
  3. The Iranian regime must be removed from power. They are the biggest impediment to peace in the region and the people of Iran want them gone.
  4. Israel continues to develop the Abraham Accords with moderate Arab nations. and, eventually, with a moderate Iranian leadership.
  5. Palestinian leaders emerge with a vision for a thriving Palestinian state that can coexist peacefully with Israel. One of these leaders beats the PA in an election and begins the process of developing a Palestinian state.
  6. Everyone lives happily ever after.
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Interesting theory. Does this exist on any large scale anywhere in the world?

 

Fascinating episode from Einat Wilf's podcast in reference to an article she co-wrote with two Arabs who support peaceful coexistence with Israel shortly after the Abraham Accords were signed. The most interesting part of the discussion comes up at around 10:15 where she talks about the silencing of voices like these by Western progressives. The tl/dr: Pro-peace Arab voices are silenced by Western progressives because that perspective conflicts with their decolonization anti-Zionist narrative, so these voices hurt the cause.

view more: next ›