Don_alForno

I guess that's what they're aiming for, to turn the general public against protests (even more).

Keine Ahnung, machen die Fußballverbände aber immer so. Die FIFA zahlt im WM Land auch keine Steuern.

That's low.

Mal sehen wo diese Entscheidung auf der Käse Skala liegt.

Vom Laster gefallenen Käse klauen -> Entfernung aus dem Beamtenverhältnis.

Sich als Teil der Exekutive anmaßen, Entscheidungen der Judikative zu ignorieren -> ... ?

Sounds like taxes with extra steps.

Die Idee finde ich ganz hervorragend.

Also bei mir ist DHL von den Gezeigten der einzige Dienst, der liefert, wann er geschrieben hat, dass er liefert.

DPD stellt hier Pakete mit "zerbrechlich" und Pfeil nach oben zielsicher mit der Unterseite nach oben ab, und Hermes klaut Pakete und behauptet sie wären im Shop.

Ministerpräsidentin Söder

Das ist halt dann kein generisches Femininum mehr.

The EU can't "save" the rest of the world alone, true. All I'm saying is it doesn't necessarily require the entire globe to cooperate to outlaw something just because it's on the Internet. And that Mozilla scheme won't save you either.

I mean they don't have to literally jail advertisers (although I'd love that). I'd agree with hefty fines. Which, while not perfect, several EU laws have shown is possible unilaterally (e.g. Apple allowing third party app stores in the EU, albeit kicking and screaming).

I agree that it's a mountain to climb, but we sure won't reach the summit if we walk in the other direction.

Opt-in IS simple. Mom just won't opt in.

Privacy based advertizing:

1. Develop ad

2. Think about what websites your target demographic will probably frequent. (Be creative, dear marketing person! You can do it! This is the essence of what you're getting paid for!)

3. Pay those sites to display your ad

Done.

Forget about the technical details and whether the user understands what it is.

No. Why? It's simple. They are collecting data I don't want the ad networks to have instead of the ad networks and give it to the ad networks. That's only more private than the status quo if I'm okay with them to have this data and trust them to handle it responsibly. Which I have no reason to.

which is why they correctly say that the user won't understand the Feature.

See explanation above. That's not too complicated to explain to a person that managed to turn on the computer. It only gets complicated when you try to follow the mental gymnastics you need to think this feature adds privacy for anybody.