Eiri

joined 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wait have Canadian conservatives sunken that low? For real?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I may be missing something, but why can't you have the bank account and phone number both in Lebanon?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 days ago

The kind whose parents watch media that demonizes the Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

In a ranked choice system or other better voting system, yes.

In the current system, voting for anyone but the least bad choice among the two that stand a chance is almost like giving your vote to the one that has the best chances, regardless of your preferences.

Look up the spoiler effect in elections.

Or, CGP Grey has an excellent explanation of the whole thing.

https://www.cgpgrey.com/politics-in-the-animal-kingdom

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (10 children)

That is not the question. The question is: it's a binary choice. People should be aware that not voting helps the worst candidate win. Why not vote for the less bad candidate then?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wait, does it? Are joules in thermal energy per kelvin a purely linear relationship?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Oh, I meant spermicide creams in place of condoms.

I didn't know about the spermicide condoms at all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

For real? Amazing. I need to follow the local news more, sheesh.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Didn't the US use to invade countries for much, much less of a reason than that? Sheesh.

These days I'm finding myself agreeing with the Iranian government more and more often because of Israel's crap. I don't like agreeing with the Iranian government.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Omelet composed of >60% frozen vegetables and seasoned with soy sauce.

It doesn't hold itself together at all and it looks disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hmm, maybe there are particular challenges to free medications? Even Quebec's most left-wing mainstream party, Québec Solidaire, doesn't quite go as far as free drugs for all, afaik.

Not that the idea doesn't sound lovely.

 

One thing I liked (and sometimes disliked) about Reddit was that my feed was a mix of posts in communities I'd joined and a few suggestions of posts from subs The Algorithm™ thought I might like.

On Lemmy I'm realizing I'm starting to fall into a bit of an echo chamber situation because I basically only see stuff I'm already a member of, unless I explicitly go to All or scroll the list of communities.

Are there less involved (lazy) ways of discovering new stuff and broadening my horizons a bit?

 

Sometimes, when I'm really cold, it can take over an hour to warm me up, even with a heating blanket. The quickest solution, a hot shower, feels really inefficient with all the heat going down the drain.

That got me thinking about microwaves. They heat food (partly) from the inside, contrary to simple infrared radiation.

Could we safely do that with people?

I found a Reddit thread where a non-lethal weapon and people getting eye damage because they stayed too long in front of a radar dish.

Could some sort of device be made that would warm specific areas (say, a hand or a leg) without endangering sensitive areas like the eyes?

Would it actually warm someone up from the inside? Would it be possible to make it safe?

Would it present advantages in cases of hypothermia, compared to heated IV fluids?

 

I don't see how it's a benefit to capitalism or companies or, well, anyone, really, to allow people to make thousands of trades a day for minute profits on each.

My gut feeling is that the stock market would not suffer, and less resources would be wasted, if trades and updates to stock prices were limited to, say, one batch per hour.

There are probably reasons the system is the way it is though.

view more: next ›