Why not NFS? Regardless, wouldn't it be slower anyway compared to virtiofs
?
GathererStuff
I think NFS would be a better choice if I decide to go that route. Isn't SAMBA slower and older than NFS?
strace can be very verbose and requires a lot of knowledge that i doubt i can share through comments back and forth.
No worries. Thank a lot nonetheless.
is creating an intermediary like others have commented on in this post an option?
What do you mean by intermediary? Do you mean syncing the files with the VM and then sharing the synced copy with the host?That wouldn't work since my drive is smaller than the cloud drive and I need all the files on-demand.
It does not, hence my question.
do you have to provide a username/password or token when you try to access the drive now?
I do but it's through the proprietary GUI of the binary which has no CLI or API I can use.
I just checked and it is mounted as a fuse
drive.
do you know how to use strace?
A very confident NO :)
That would be impossible since the cloud drive is 2TB and my physical storage space is under 500GB in size.
I have no idea how it is mounted (how can I find out?) because the binary is proprietary. This is why it is contained inside a virtual machine.
The cloud drive is mounted inside a virtual machine for security purposes as the binary is proprietary and I do not want to mount it on the host (bwrap
and the like introduce a whole lot of problems, the drive doesn't sync anymore and I have to relogin each time). I do not use the virtual machine per se, I just start it and leave it be.
I need to access all files conveniently and transparently depending on what I need at work in that particular moment.
Hard no.