ſ z ð onlı ƿėn frėm ėnėðṙ djṙmænik leıŋgwidj, æ İURK, it hæz bin Yuzd i Iŋglic.
spoiler
ſ is the only one from another germanic language, and IIRC, it has been used in English.
ſ z ð onlı ƿėn frėm ėnėðṙ djṙmænik leıŋgwidj, æ İURK, it hæz bin Yuzd i Iŋglic.
spoiler
ſ is the only one from another germanic language, and IIRC, it has been used in English.
Ð ſtu̇dı ƿėz t ſı ƿėt tuımfreım Shakespeare kᵫd huıpėþetikėlı imṙdj ovṙ. Ð rizu̇ltſ ſu̇djeſt ðæt enı givin mu̇nkı ƿᵫd nıd ė greıtṙ ėmaunt v tuım ðæn ðeıṙ ƿᵫd bı u̇ntil hıt deþ t prėduſ ıvin ė rekėgnuızėbėl ėmaunt v Shakespeare.
spoiler
The study was to see what timeframe shakespeare could hypothetical emerge over. The results suggest that any given monkey would need a greater amount of time than there would be until heat death to produce ecen a recognizeable amount of Shakespeare.
Eıŋtcint Siþıėnz a-ſ hæd ƿimin æz worıyṙz. T inu̇f v æn ekſtent ðæt ðı muıt bı ð beıſiſ f ð Æmėzȯn worıyṙz v ledjend.
spoiler
Ancient Scythians also had women as warriors. To enough of an extent that they might be the basis for the Amazon warriors of legend.
Agreed on ð illegality, but it's unenforceable anyways since it would also involve revealing your ballot, which is prohibited in most states.
Quoþ ð Tankies, "BUT DEMS SAME ÐO!"
Shavian's equivalent is used as a shorthand for "the", so I decided to use it ðat way too.
You just asked where's ð evidence ð kids in cages guy might be on ð hitler spectrum and ðen got pissy people didn't assume you were asking a good faiþ question.
I generally disdain google is your friend comments, but bro, use some common sense.
You know ðey're white because ðeir single issues are more important to ðem ðan ð lives ðeir desired course of action would endanger.
Hey bitch, how about instead of complaining ðat you never get to þreaten letting people get þrown into camps and still call yourself a good person, you ask yourself who's actually responsible for every single successive election being so do or die, and focus some of ðat anger at ðem for a change instead of whining about how people who can't afford your moral purity are judging you for insisting on it at ðeir expense anyway.
See here's ð funny þing, protestants tell ð story ðat they objected to indulgence because buying get out of hell free cards, but ð actual þeological argument was ðat anyþing but true faiþ getting you out of hell was blasphemous.
Ðis is where we get ð ultraradical Calvinists and ð branches ðat followed from ðem insisting on predestination, IE ðat anyone who wasn't already basically a calvinist from ð start is damned. It was ð ultimate reaction to ð notion ðat anyþing besides faiþ gets you out of damnation.
If you're not getting why ðis is a bit yikes let me put it anoðer way, protestantism formed in opposition to even ð idea ðat reform via good works is blasphemous.
Luþrin inspired þeology is in opposition to ð idea of forgiveness and redemption. Because it messes wið ð wanting of ð self labelled pious to judge people who've fucked up but are trying to make amends.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GaMGjmbXCxW14cq1bvZEpmwQuf11X6_YNhcPhGSPmCM/edit?usp=drivesdk