TheBelgian

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

this comment suits you as well. little censorshit

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

you are making them vulnerable by considering they can't stand by themselves. Again I never attacked them but you can't see that as there's no track of my comments.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

no but you censor and go even back in history to remove traces of an approved and upvoted comment to give a certain portrait of a user.

why are you actually providing this instance, really?

 

I replied to thread from Linus Torvalds and agreed with what he said but added my opinion which was not hate or rejection (literally) https://lemmy.ml/comment/477089 (ask for a revert)

My response to a mod (not committed in order to be able to post this thread)

They even removed my upvoted comment about a ChatGPT's response regarding question "Is disagreeing is hating?" i was going to share again with this person Arthur: https://lemmy.ml/comment/445401

This is a pathetic move and so low compared to what the extreme you're criticizing could do, at least them, are honest in their stupidity.

Dessalines posted https://lemmy.ml/post/1140303 "Be respectful..." my twist is "...as long as you agree with us".

One thing for sure, you are not serving your cause. BUT, I won't be a hater, I definitely won't be your supporter!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Mastodon was for a while flooded by p0rn and hentai with some very edgy content. That was ridiculous. It was a reason why I left mastodon in the beginning.

My salutations to @nutomic and others mods, that's a crazy idea to provide an open access platform.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because we don't want to watch this crap.

p0rn is not lacking of any "internet" space. Why would you want to put it everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Flatpak is kind of bringing the BSD mindset of base system versus end-user apps to Linux.

What must one not read. The reason is that FreeBSD develop and maintains the whole base system: kernel + system related frontend and because it's a clean architecture. For the isolation they had jails before containers was a thing.

Flatpak was not about sandboxing, this aspect is quite recent. It is a response to how bad the CI-pseudoCD was for Gnome and to build/deploy apps based on gnome-stack easily. For proprietary product, I still have to see it a proprietary product not available outside flatpak..

Don't get me wrong, it's good that Flatpak tackle the sandboxing question that was not what was sold previously. Also, I use official repos and mainly FOSS. Flatpak won't prevent a supplychain attack. So my trust remains the main repos.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

May I add:

  • "disagreeing is not hating"

Even ChatGPT can get this.