TigrisMorte

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

and when you realize you've paid to watch them go all Uvalde on their asses?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

"Mr. Lumbergh told me to talk to payroll and then payroll told me to talk to Mr. Lumbergh and I still haven't received my paycheck and he took my stapler and he never brought it back and then they moved my desk to storage room B and there was garbage on it..."
https://youtu.be/Gk7Jjl3qX5o?si=qGaXYNmKHM3vjyrI

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Their theory is that they can replace Human employees with this and thus save money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Can you say, merger and consolidation leading to monopoly practices in a text book example of how not to regulate and oversee a free market? I knew you could.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Your calling files, book documents to be specific, books, doesn't change that IA is storing files, ebooks to be specific, nor that the ruling shall affect all Libraries, which includes the Internet Archive to be specific. And the actual issue, is that the publishers refuse to offer ebooks to Libraries as they assume it'll cost sales when in fact the folks using the Library are there as they are not going to go buy one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And just like that you've seen one. Now contact the prior dude on his trist welevision and let them know.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

They are not finished with it yet and the folks backing it are playing so they see the work and are having fun.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

They all hope it'll end years of having to pay employees.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

And in the two prior posts, children, we can see the difference between trained and experienced.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Which would indeed be why it is technically, not a thing. See the natural outcome of a thing is not necessarily the intent of the thing. The two party system is as you say. But that isn't the design of the Constitutional language. It is the design of humans themselves.

view more: next ›