aio

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Mr. Costantino said the design was not at fault and that the towering mast, which stood 237 feet tall, had not created “any kind of problem.”

“The ship was an unsinkable ship,” he said. “I say it, I repeat it.”

- Designer of sunken ship

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

~~For some reason the previous week's thread doesn't show up on the feed for me (and didn't all week)...~~ nvm, i somehow managed to block froztbyte by accident, no idea how

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I don't think it's very surprising. The various CS departments are extremely happy to ride the wave of easy funding and spend a lot of time boosting AI, just like how a few years ago all the cryptographers were getting into blockchains. For instance they added an entire new "AI" major, while eliminating the electrical engineering major on the grounds that "computation" is more important than electrical engineering.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

No, but the moon does.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

the moon could get mad - fact.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

the computational cost of operating over a matrix is always going to be convex relative to its size

This makes no sense - "convex" doesn't mean fast-growing. For instance a constant function is convex.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

My university sends me checks occasionally, like when they overcharged the premium on my dental insurance. No idea why they can't just do an electronic transfer like for my stipend.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Harry Potter and the Surprisingly Good Take

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you want a serious discussion of interpretations of quantum mechanics, here is a transcript of a lecture "Quantum Mechanics in Your Face" which has the best explanation I've ever seen. I'd recommend the first 6 of Peter Shor's Quantum Computation notes (don't worry they're each very short) for just enough background to understand the transcript.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

I honestly think anyone who writes "quantum" in an article should be required to take a linear algebra exam to avoid being instantly sacked

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (16 children)

Possibly the worst misunderstanding of quantum mechanics I've ever seen. I have no idea how anyone managed to convince themselves that the laws of physics are somehow different for conscious observers.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (9 children)
view more: next ›