Both based on Bing’s search engine
kn98
joined 5 months ago
Initial distribution was through a captcha-protected crypto ‘faucet’. The faucet is still up. Did the developers keep a large part of the coins themselves? I’ve never heard that.
No, because I’m not a trader. It’s not all about the exchange rate for me, but about the utility of the coin.
Most coins exist because other coins exist. Nano and Monero not necessarily.
I only like two cryptocurrencies.
Nano: free transactions, each wallet runs it’s own blockchain, so it’s got no negative impact on the environment.
Monero: allows for anonymous transfers
Right. But if things do start to cost money, should that be stopped by laws?
Believing we’re living in the end of times is nothing new. Up til now, it never turned out true.
I agree with your first two paragraphs.
The third, well, it’s your choice to choose not to have children. That’s fine and I understand. But people shouldn’t feel obligated not to get children to save the climate.
Not that you’re suggesting that, just clarifying.
I’m convinced that a great part of the people that claim to not have an inner voice are either:
- lying to be interesting
- unaware of their inner voice
- not understanding what ‘inner voice’ means. It’s not exactly like someone is talking to you, right? But it does come close.
TIL: How The Founder Of Zionism, Theodor Herzl, Planned on Eradicating Palestinians as early as 1890
It’s barely an article, mostly embedded video’s of a YT channel called ’The Homeless Romantic’… Shady
view more: next ›
No, because one transaction uses as much energy as a normal household in a year. Or something like that.