sensibilidades

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's not even like the object screams 'sexual organ'. Boston University archaeologist Curtis Runnels, who was not involved in the recent study, told Science the ornament looks "rather shapeless", and at first glance, it's hard to disagree.

really wish they’d said “at first glans”

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

are you going to be biking in water deeper than 1500 ft?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Maybe, but another way of looking at it is that this already unprofitable company just lost (potentially) 5-10% of their marketable advertising attention. That makes their job of becoming profitable harder, and anything they do to compensate may well make their situation worse. (It could, obviously, also have no effect given how large Reddit already is)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

of course the top reply is some nft bullshit

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"might only provide 'milliseconds'

"Don't give me your mumbo-jumbo Mister Scientist - will the alarm go off or not?!"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seriously, Trump earned those impeachments.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Fry: How many atmospheres can the ship withstand?

Professor: Well, it’s a spaceship, so I’d say anywhere between zero and one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

in fairness, the title said “how”, not why

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I mean this completely apolitically - has anyone ever seen Hunter Biden and Jordan Peterson in the same place at the same time?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They don't actually care about the law. Hunter Biden is only useful to them as something to deflect and waste air complaining about, they don't actually want anything to happen to him legally and they don't care about principle.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A more charitable interpretation is that the text that people thought would best train ChatGPT tended to be thoughtful and well-written posts like yours. Maybe you don't write like ChatGPT, but ChatGPT writes like you.

view more: ‹ prev next ›