surph_ninja

The Georgia process actually required the Dems to go through an appeal, so I’m sure it wasn’t cheap.

She’s on the ballot, or has write-in status in 42 states. Dems only managed to successfully kick her off the ballot in 2 states.

The Democrats don’t spend millions in legal fees to sue “fringe candidates” off of the ballot.

Yeah, media refusing to cover a candidate tends to impact their polling. Big surprise.

You’re getting really unhinged in the comments for people just making sure the democrats are doing the opposite, which is what you’re implying they would do.

I suspect you’re getting upset because you know the Biden admin advanced some of Trump’s worst policies, and you don’t want anyone pointing that out.

It wasn’t meant to convince you. It was meant to show the lurkers you’re full of shit. I’m confident they get the picture.

Blocked.

Defending the oil lobby’s anti-nuclear propaganda is really not helping you.

https://environmentalprogress.org/the-war-on-nuclear

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/apr/05/anti-nuclear-lobby-misled-world

https://rpmanetworks.com/atomkraftclonesite-english/docs/the-fossil-fuel-industrys-war-on-nuclear-power/

https://www.influencewatch.org/movement/opposition-to-nuclear-energy/

https://www.wsj.com/articles/oil-gas-lobby-opposes-state-subsidies-for-nuclear-power-producers-1493145109

https://climatecoalition.org/who-opposes-nuclear-energy/

https://www.axios.com/2017/12/15/big-oils-electric-fight-against-coal-and-nuclear-1513304200

the claim that the oil industry paid anyone to stop nuclear is a right wing lie.

Oil lobby bot confirmed.

Nuclear is not capitalists’ “biggest outfit.” You’re thinking of oil, and they pay astroturfers to convince people like you to be anti-nuclear.

I don’t assume unlimited funds. I know that the only way we can actually address climate change is to overthrow the capitalists driving the pollution. Ending their wars would provide far more than adequate funding, even before wealth redistribution.

I can’t imagine being so uninformed that you believe the advantages of nuclear energy has no scientific basis. On par with the flat earthers.

It’s easy to tell who’s been propagandized, because they care more about how much it will cost than actually saving the planet.

I’m not concerned about economic sense. I’m worried about keeping the planet habitable.

Cheaper long term, yes. Higher upfront cost.