ydieb

It was a general statement.

Oh I know.

Well obviously.

What I hate with this is that is defines that the army itself is good or bad. But in reality it is what it is used for. If its actually used for defence, then it's very honorable. When it's used as a tool to exploit resources to the rich, (aka generally being the aggressor), it's not.

As a taller person, if this gives me sufficient legroom and a seat that actually distributes the weight over my whole thighs such that I can sit somewhat comfortable, this seems like a major upgrade to me.

But he has worked as a ceo before and thus has ceo experience! /s and thus the circle (jerk) continues.

When the whole western society has been force fed that "we must consume else our economy will collapse", not continously outselling (and throwing away barely year old work) is bad, this is the result.

This graph does what every other predictive graph does, cuts the superlinear growth short just after one year. It's guanteed to be very wrong. At some point we will have way more solar than needed and it will severely flat out, but I don't think is even close it it.

Funny thing is that I am an software engineer.

Anyway, you might be right, but you also might be wrong, it entirely depends on how they have implemented it.

They are from a gameplay perspective the same game. That ubisoft possibly does the sadly very common "to win the marathon you have to sprint faster", which makes it take a lot of work to spit out something very similar would not be surprising, but also does not change the fact that they are imo too similar.

Because they are releasing the same game multiple times with just a splash of paint.

Those need a entirely different type of help.

Interesting that zig is so much lower than c in expressiveness. Isn't that a bit weird?