Quality as well. Ass vikings had audio mastering that's outrageously bad for a title made with so much money and the omnipresent vaseline smear of TAA in the recent titles hasn't done their art direction any favors.
zecg
Same. It was dissapointingly shallow in characterization and the dialogues could have used some editing but ot was a fun and functional game that looked great and had well-designed gameplay. I played it through the end ana am looking to get a sequel in a few years on a deep sale.
thriving
May you thrive in interesting times
It's all insultingly preachy and puerile, apart from taking me right out of the setting. GTA didn't make me a serial killer, this whiny shit won't make anyone a decent person.
To quote Homestar Runner, like a flaming sack of crap
No, because they pay out the nose for huge SUVs these days which increases the chance they'll kill us cyclists.
I'd love to play it, but I'm not paying more than 15€ for it, I'm very patient.
Never seen mortismal and I've only seen SkillUp a few times. I don't really follow or need any review at release time, I'm not touching any game that's 50€ or more until two years have passed and it's in the vicinity of 75% off.
Can someone give me a rundown on why there‘s so much negativity revolving around this?
First five minutes of SkillUp's review is a good rundown. It seems like a mindless action clickathon with imitation of gameplay seen in better games, a safe sterile story and a large chunk of world design repurposed leftovers from someone's abandoned Overwatch-but-DA ambitions.
edit: also, I note how reviews that peg this as a "return to form" are written and SkillUp's has video to back his opinions and it looks pretty damning.
That's why I go there