this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
324 points (97.1% liked)

World News

32286 readers
852 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@[email protected] was not actually claiming that China is not independent. They are trying prove that Taiwan is independent through reductio ad absurdium. Basically, they try to derive something absurd (in this case China not being independent) from your claims.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thus “pedantic nonsense”

You can’t prove independence through logical contradiction. It’s a state of foreign recognition. China clearly won the war enough to be recognized. Taiwan did not.

Independence isn’t a vibe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reductio ad absurdium is not "pedantic nonsense."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When misapplied that badly, it really is.