this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
48 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15859 readers
27 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Don’t know why he wastes time criticizing him since JT doesn’t do anything wrong. Also really funny that him and other commenters are complaining about The Deprogram being like Chapo.

Upon deeper research, it turns out Day used to post on the subreddit to dunk on BadEmpanada, which is funny since Day himself has strong BadEmpanada vibes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think it’s necessarily a Marxist or nonMarxist concept. It basically just points out a huge flaw in the popular understanding of how capitalist economies function. And when you pull on that thread enough it reveals that they’re all predicated on lies. Which in turn reveals the fundamental truth of Marxist class analysis. At least if you’re open to those ideas. I think MMT is fine in that regard, and because it’s never going to be implemented within capitalist governments, it’s useful more as rhetoric than as an actual strategy for change. But I dunno. I’m not into MMT enough to know all the ins and outs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

mmt is beloved by socdems because the implication is usually that we can use the money printer to pay for social programs. and that's an infant leftist fantasy because there's no real democratic control over government spending in the first place. the ruling class isn't going to hand out free money to the rabble for no reason, they're going to enrich themselves. at best you'll get tax cuts for homeowners or something, paid for by dollar imperialism. roderick is right.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's kind of what I was getting at. I don't think MMT is necessarily wrong about how money works on a certain technical level. It's just that capitalist states depend on myths about money that are contrary to MMT. So yes, MMT within these states is a fantasy that will never come to be. But understanding why this is the case can be on on-ramp to Marxism for the curious baby leftist.