Linux

48033 readers

943 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-28

Arch is Easier to Use than Debian (lemm.ee)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So the thing with Debian and any Debian based distro like Ubuntu or Linux Mint is there is no big centralized software repo like the AUR. Yes there is the apt repository but if you want something that's not in there, get ready to read the documentation or follow random guides.

For example, one of my friends wanted to download an audio tool called Reaper. On Windows this is just looking up the application and clicking on the .exe. It really depends on the dev if they include a .deb, sometimes you might need to download the .sh file or they may tell you to compile it yourself. Perhaps, you have to add a ppa. On Arch, all I have to do is Paru -S Reaper, if there are multiple Reapers I can look for that by typing Paru Reaper.

Now that Arch is so easy to install with the Archscript, and the software repo so vast and easy to use, is Debian really user friendly if you have to jump through several hoops to download programs?

Edit: yeah yeah there's flathub and stuff but that's more of a last resort, optimally, you want to get it the correct way.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

These are download instructions from Librewolf's official website:

Ubuntu: https://librewolf.net/installation/debian/

Arch: https://librewolf.net/installation/debian/

Ubuntu is noticeably longer as you need to wget a specific link and adding the keys.

Arch is just one command from the aur whether you want to use pacman, yay, or paru

[+] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have installed manually before. I'm not saying that it's hard, I'm saying that arch is faster to do so since it's one command. You're not going to memorize the wget link and process to install keys for every program. Why is this so controversial?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Arch (arch based x86_64)
Download and install

https://sourceforge.net/projects/joborun/files/r/librewolf-122.0.1-03-x86_64.pkg.tar.lz/download

or cd /tmp
mkdir libw
cd libw
wget https://git.disroot.org/joborun-pkg/jobextra/raw/commit/3f78c1796cc471eed86f817cdffc7bcaa038d5b1/librewolf/PKGBUILD

makepkg

sudo pacman -U *x86_64.pkg.tar.*

librewolf
or
firejail librewolf

@pineapplelover @catloaf

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

paru -S librewolf