catloaf

joined 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

No, they make all kinds of exceptions. I'd just write a note about it not meeting expectations when you actually played it.

If they don't accept it, I'd just eat the few bucks as the cost of learning to inspect purchases right when you make them, whether that's software or physical.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There was a card game?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm guessing poor children in Nigeria don't have a large amount of fat and muscle to use like that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Someone point out for me what I'm supposed to be looking at in the picture, because I don't see it, and I skimmed the article but didn't see anything helpful

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

This just means there will be fewer changes. You can tag any commit for a release at any time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Don't get excited, it's not available yet.

Also, it doesn't sound like anything new, it's just Ravenholm in winter. Nothing about the actual Borealis.

Points for rebuilding in UE5 though, that's harder than using existing Source assets. But probably easier than actually working with the Source engine.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't even have kids!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

They got away with it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

I want to see a reenactment of this. Either like the Rick & Morty or the NYT Verbatim "What is a photocopier" case.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What if you're driving through a zoo though?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 days ago (4 children)

The Economist can fuck alllllll the way off with their right-wing agenda

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

You don't need to modify the files to modify data in memory.

 

Link to post: https://lemmy.world/post/19274834

If you tap that link in Boost it'll probably crash, so don't do it unless you're okay with that.

I'm guessing the problem is that the post URL is a magnet link.

Edit: oh yeah, to work around, you'll have to open it in a browser and hide it.

 

I got banned earlier today with the message "rule 1", no other information about why, or which comment broke the rule. As far as I can tell it was this one, which just says "We want the bot gone. That’s it. It’s really that simple."

So I checked the modlog for other bans, and @[email protected] was banned today as well, also just for "rule 1", probably either for the comment saying "a stupid bot writing useless bullshit" or "This is what you call "Not listening to criticism."", neither of which are an attack on any person.

(Also earlier today @[email protected] was banned with the message "fuck off", which I'm pretty sure is not a reason to ban someone from a major community, but doesn't appear to be related to the MBFC bot.)

One more today, @[email protected] was banned, again just "rule 1", last comment being this one, again not an attack on any person.

So what's the deal here? I couldn't find any rules for mods on lemmy.world with a brief poke around, but are we letting mods run major communities like little fiefdoms, banning people for criticism?

view more: next ›