this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
127 points (92.1% liked)

Technology

59091 readers
5460 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They gonna get waymo fares

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (29 children)

Can someone explain like I'm five how Waymo has robitaxis without drivers behind the wheel and automated driving such as that offered by Tesla is not yet able to do the same?

Is it just that Waymo has mapped a small area really, really well? What's the difference? Why is Tesla so bad at it but Waymo is able to do it?

[–] [email protected] 78 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Waymo doesn’t give a shit if their cars are ugly and can cover them in dozens upon dozens of cameras and sensors. They’re not selling them to consumers who care about looks, they are renting them to riders who don’t want to die on the short trip. They also only operate in a small region of the country with limited weather conditions and frequently stop service when weather is bad.

Tesla is run by an idiot who insists that a pair of cameras and a single lidar sensor that they keep deciding to disable can somehow magically always work in all weather and lighting conditions and is selling to consumers who don’t want an ugly car and expect to be able to operate their purchase at all times

Different constraints leads to different levels of success

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Going off what fishpen0 said, Waymo actually has sensors on it to detect things and can "understand" its surroundings much better than Tesla cars can wish just cameras.

I've ridden in Waymos and they are smooth riding. After the initial "OMG! There's no driver!" You kind of forget about it. You get to your (limited area) destination safely and without much hassle.

I can go more in depth if ya want.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

So it begins...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Good. Every less impatient, wreckless, human, driver on the road, the better.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Be careful with that logic, these are jobs forever lost to robots. They will eventually come for your job or the job of someone you know. Increasingly the question won’t be whether robots can do X better than humans, but whether they should.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Reason number one million capitalism sucks. We should be happy to turn over dangerous or menial jobs to machines but we can't do that because without jobs our society views us as worthless.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That's literally the goal.

I used to do electrical engineering at an architecture firm, and we would say, design a hospital that has 300 identical exam rooms in it.

Guess what happens when someone decides that we need one more outlet in one of those rooms? Or that they need to be on the other wall? Or that a new piece of furniture gets added?

Do you think that all 300 rooms would just update with that new requirement? No. It is someone's job to sit there, click on the outlet on the pallette in the left side of their screen, drag it into the room, rotate it properly, attach it to the right wall, give it a circuit from the panel, and then repeat for 300 rooms. It can take weeks.

I learned how to write software because I realized what a fucking crock of shit waste of time that is. Why are you celebrating and defending menial bullshit that can be automated? A utopian future is literally only possible if we automate away most jobs. I don't think our current system of resource distribution is setup for a utopian future, but it can literally only happen if all the pieces are in place for it, and automating the basic necessities (like building design, and transportation) is one of those necessary pieces. If AI automates software development, that will be awesome because then way more industries (like architecture) will be able to get the software they need to run effectively.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well it is one thing to automate a repetitive task in your job, and quite another to eliminate entire professions. The latter has serious ramifications and shouldn’t be taken lightly. What you call “menial bullshit” is the entire livelihood and profession of quite a few people, speaking of taxis for one. And the means to make some extra cash for others. Also, a stepping stone for immigrants who may not have the skills or means to get better jobs but are thus able to make a living legally. And sometimes the refuge of white collar workers down on their luck. What are all these people going to do when taxi driving is relegated to robots? Will there be (less menial) alternatives? Will these offer a livable wage? Or will such people end up long-term unemployed? Will the state have enough cash to support them and help them upskill or whatever is needed to survive and prosper?

A technological utopia is a promise from the 1950s. Hasn’t been realized yet. Isn’t on the horizon anytime soon. Careful that in dreaming up utopias we don’t build dystopias.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You can argue for both automation and fair treatment for workers. For example, if gas lamps become electric, you could give the lamplighters some time or new training to find a new job. I'm sure a labor academic would know better how to navigate jobs being obsoleted, but the answer to technologic progress isn't "keep taxi drivers at all costs" it's "protect taxi drivers from corporations"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well it is one thing to automate a repetitive task in your job, and quite another to eliminate entire professions.

No it is not. That is literally how those jobs are eliminated. 30 years ago CAD came out and helped to automate drafting tasks to the point that a team of 20 drafters turned into 1 or 2 drafters and eventually turned into engineers drafting their own drawings.

What you call “menial bullshit” is the entire livelihood and profession of quite a few people, speaking of taxis for one.

Congratulations, despite you wanting to look at it with rose coloured glasses, that does not change the fact that it is objectively menial bullshit.

What are all these people going to do when taxi driving is relegated to robots?

Find other entry level jobs. If we eliminate *all * entry level jobs through automation, then we will need to implement some form of basic income as there will not be enough useful work for everyone to do. That would be a great problem to have.

Will the state have enough cash to support them and help them upskill or whatever is needed to survive and prosper?

Yes, the state has access to literally all of the profits from automation via taxes and redistribution.

A technological utopia is a promise from the 1950s. Hasn’t been realized yet. Isn’t on the horizon anytime soon. Careful that in dreaming up utopias we don’t build dystopias.

Oh wow, you're saying that if human beings can't create something in 70 years, then that means it's impossible and we'll never create it?

Again, the only way to get to a utopia is to have all of the pieces in place, which necessitates a lot of automation and much more advanced technology than we already have. We're only barely at the point where we can start to practice biology and medicine in a meaningful way, and that's only because computers completely eliminated the former profession of computer.

Be careful that you don't keep yourself stuck in our current dystopia out of fear of change.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Only a matter of time when these robotaxis become a trend and start populating major cities. Eventually roads and infrastructure will get built for these cars for the sake of "convince", thus leaving out any kind of investment for public transportation and walkable roads.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

That’s more than I would have expected at this stage. Huh.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I've used them a few times now and the novelty hasn't worn off yet.

When it does wear off I think I'll move back to alternatives that cost less, unless Waymo gets competitive on price.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Interesting, when I took Waymo, it was cheaper than Uber and Lyft, pre tip.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How much more does it cost to the alternatives?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Uber is quoting me about $15 for a journey that Waymo charged me $19 for.

There's a tip to add for the Uber ride. I'm not sure what the cost for Uber would have been when I took the Waymo.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

100,000 rides a week. Impressive.

load more comments
view more: next ›