this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
73 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

1321 readers
334 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Also inside the uploaded source code was some GPL 2 source code, which renders the not-very-open WCL moot.

Wait a second. That casts the whole thing in a different light. They're now obligated to either stop distributing the thing in any form, or else open-source the entire thing whether they want to or not. Right?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

Schrodinger's license?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That really kicks the llamas ass.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That really kicks the whip's ass.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, no. They're right. I goofed...

That really kicks the llamas whip.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

"Llamas shouldn't drive!"

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes, WinAmp is still around: the audio player of choice for the Napster generation. You know, folks who are in their 40s now and are starting to get middle-aged presbyopia. If they remove their new reading glasses, it might make some of the many skins in the WinAmp Skin Museum look rather better.

At least the napster generation understood that digital copies is not stealing. They understand the concept of a copy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Winamp is a prime example of all the right people making nerd-ass decisions and then getting utterly strangled by a corporate master which Does Not Get It.

They worked on audio and video streaming, and the dolts who bought them took a long damn time to figure out that might be used for illicit purposes.

Then they published Gnutella and WASTE as filesharing protocols and even those idiots realized what they'd be used for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Sonique is still OS though?