this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
212 points (96.9% liked)

News

23310 readers
5230 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This week, the Supreme Court sided with federal agents to remove razor wire put in place by Texas along the Rio Grande. The state is using wire and state agents to block Border Patrol from accessing a section of the border in Eagle Pass. Homeland Security is demanding access to the area by Friday, but Gov. Greg Abbott is doubling down. Laura Barrón-López discussed the dispute with Stephen Vladeck.

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 91 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It sure would be nice if Democrats were as committed to doing good as Republicans are to doing evil.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But that's the problem. Democrats aren't heroes. They're just regular politicians trying to climb the ladder and maybe do a good thing for people they care about personally. They stand in opposition to evil, sometimes, but that's not the same as actively trying to make things better for everyone. You could count on one hand the number of leaders we have actively working towards a better world, and most of them would be considered crackpots.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

A lot of the democrats aren't even good politicians, they're just less corrupt than the GOP so they have to do.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

They're literally only less corrupt enough (and not an ounce more) such that they don't get laughed at when they say you should vote for the lesser of two evils.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Send in the fucking troops. When racist fucks like these tried to stop kids from going to school, that's what worked.

Fucking inbreds.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

The troops are already there -- the President can federalize the Texas National Guard and give us a look a what a modern-day Little Rock High School looks like. Garland should be seeking an arrest warrant against Abbott for insurrection, as well.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago

Garland wouldn't even look into Jan 6th until being shamed into it. God I wish we had a super hardcore attorney general right now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

garland is a worthless stooge.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I really wish Texans would take a page out of French protestors and just start setting things on fire, spewing trucks full of animal waste all over the unecessarily fancy government buildings, and finally put Abbot and his entire wealthy billionaire grifting affluent family under the guillotine, done all in Minecraft.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Wouldn’t go over well in the end. “Antifa has started burning cities down, and is using biological weapons against the government. We are taking action against them.”

We’ve already seen black vans grabbing people in Portland during protests, what do you think will happen when their claims are only mostly baseless, and not completely baseless?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

What do you think is going to happen doing nothing?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

By that logic, I guess we should all live our lives in fear of the potential backlash of fascists to any social action. Wait, doesn't that just result in them deciding how we live our lives anyway?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

In Minneapolis they burned a police precinct to the ground and that thing still hasn't been rebuilt to this day. Resistance is possible.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Greg Abbott's racist murderboner will not be quelled!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wait do you think the boner works

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I'd bet the only way he can get it to work is by killing brown people.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Texas: defies Supreme Court

rest of the country: wait, we can do that?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago

I hope this ends with Abbot in handcuffs.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

Eisenhower Special! Eisenhower Special! Eisenhower Special!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Does the Texas National Guard fall under the regular Military Chain of Command? Could, say an Army General, order the guard to stand down/withdraw or face court martial?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Abbott's a bigoted demogogue asshole, but this entire thing feels way overblown, thanks largely to poor reporting.

The Supreme Court ruling in question was one of those zero-commentary "shadow docket" things that simply struck down a lower court injunction holding that the federal Border Patrol was not allowed to cut razor wire laid by the Texas state guard. The clear implication is that the feds have ultimate jurisdiction and the state needs to stay in their fucking lane. But because of the ruling's terseness, there's wiggle room for Abbott to say that they didn't explicitly order Texas to stop placing wire or to obstruct Border Patrol operations, only that the feds were permitted to remove it if they wanted. So he takes that legal loophole and uses it to give a big middle finger to the administration and the Court using the same hysterical rhetoric he always has.

Problem is all the reporting on the Court ruling glossed over the mechanics and interpreted it as saying more than it actually did, which in turn makes Texas's obstinacy look less like legal trolling and more like a full-blown constitutional crisis. But Abbott has not (yet) directly disobeyed a Supreme Court order, and I expect the administration will petition the Court for an expedited slapdown of his semantic bullshit. If he ignores that, or right-wing threats pressure the Court into reversing their prior decision, then we're really into nullification crisis territory. But the freakout roiling progressives is, at this point, premature.